Two depressing facts
emerge when one surveys actor Robert Shaw’s career following his
breakout performance in Jaws (1975):
Shaw’s days on this earth were numbered, so he only had three years in which to
enjoy his newfound fame, and almost every post-Jaws movie in which he starred was terrible. Nonetheless, one gets
the impression that Shaw had a blast play-acting in macho leading roles, so,
for instance, he exudes contagious joie
de vivre in this terrible pirate movie. On some metaphysical level, the
possibility that Shaw had fun making Swashbuckler
compensates for the lack of enjoyment viewers derive from watching the movie.
On the plus side, Swashbuckler is a
fairly lavish production about an 18th-century buccaneer battling a crazed
tyrant in Jamaica. Additionally, even though director James Goldstone can’t
come close to matching the lighthearted approach to swordfighting featured in
Richard Lester’s Musketeer movies of the same era, at least Goldstone fills the
screen with talented actors. Dressed in a silly costume of red tights and a
flowing red blouse, Shaw presents a lusty copy of Errol Flynn’s patented
derring-do, and he shares mildly amusing interplay with his cheerful
second-in-command, played by James Earl Jones. (The cast also includes Beau
Bridges, Geneviève Bujold, Geoffrey Holder, and a young Angelica Huston.)
However, the material is so generic that copious screen time is wasted on clichés like peg-legged pirates brandishing
their cutlasses and growling. Worse, Peter Boyle’s performance as Lord Durant,
the aforementioned tyrant, is atrocious. Woefully miscast, his contemporary
American patois seeping through the fruity period jargon he’s forced to spew,
Boyle tries to enrich his characterization with perverse qualities, but he
seems like he’s in a different movie than everyone else. Unfortunately, the
movie he’s in isn’t any better than Swashbuckler.
Swashbuckler: LAME
Saw this on a double bill with 'My Name Is Nobody'!
ReplyDelete