Clint Eastwood’s tough-guy
screen persona had solidified by the mid-’70s, as had his stringent control over projects—even when he wasn’t also directing, Eastwood ensured
that his films were brand-consistent and supremely efficient. Given this
closely held authority, it’s interesting to look at the handful of ’70s
pictures for which Eastwood gave other filmmakers more latitude than usual. A
good case in point is Thunderbolt and
Lightfoot, the directorial debut of Michael Cimino, whose subsequent
films—notably The Deer Hunter (1978)
and Heaven’s Gate (1980)—are known
for their epic scale. Obviously, “epic” wasn’t going to
fly with Eastwood, so Cimino, who also write Thunderbolt and Lightfoot, confined his ambitions to a tight
storyline, although Cimino’s taste for big-canvas cinema is evident in the John
Ford-style panoramic shots of various Montana locations.
A straightforward
crime picture with an undercurrent of fatalism, Thunderbolt and Lightfoot begins when exuberant young car thief
Lightfoot (Jeff Bridges) encounters a country preacher (Eastwood) who is
inexplicably running from a maniac with a machine pistol. After helping the
preacher escape, Lightfoot learns his new pal is actually the infamous bank
robber known as “Thunderbolt” because he once used a cannon to bust into a
vault. The man trying to kill Thunderbolt is a former accomplice, Leary (George
Kennedy), who mistakenly believes Thunderbolt stole the haul from a heist they
committed together. Eventually, Leary catches up with Thunderbolt and Lightfoot
and accepts Thunderbolt’s story that the money was lost, so the three
men—together with Leary’s nervous wingman, Goody (Geoffrey Lewis), conspire to
rob another bank and replace the missing cash. Thunderbolt and Lightfoot isn’t precisely a buddy movie or a heist
picture, nor is it merely a car-chase flick or a thriller. Rather, it’s an
ingenious amalgam of all of those genres, a sampler plate of manly-man tropes.
Individualization is generally kept to a minimum so characters can function as
archetypes, although Brudges’ buoyant performance distinguishes Lightfoot from
everyone else—he’s brash and irresponsible, yet so full of life he makes even
the worst situations feel like exciting adventures. Cimino avoids romanticizing
the lifestyles of his characters, accentuating the collateral damage criminals
inflict and illustrating the cost criminals pay for making dangerous choices. Thunderbolt and Lightfoot is so
offbeat and so well made, from the atmospheric production values to the painterly
cinematography, that it’s tempting to read deeper meanings into the material,
especially when Bridges’ vibrant acting raises Eastwood’s game in their shared
scenes. Alas, this is really just an elevated brand of escapism, which means
its virtues are, on close inspection, quite modest. That said, the picture is
highly rewarding for viewers with appropriately calibrated expectations.
Thunderbolt and Lightfoot: GROOVY
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteCimino, who also write Thunderbolt and Lightfoot, confined his ambitions to a tight storyline
ReplyDeleteHaving watched this last night it's hard to agree with this as a description: matter of fact I gave up on it about an hour or so in, at which point I had little idea where the major characters were, who they were speaking to or, in either instance, why.
Perhaps I'm reading Cimino's later and notorious waywardness of focus into his earliest effort, but I could see where Cimino was going more easier than I could his characters.