Full disclosure: My first book was about Dalton
Trumbo, the writer-director of Johnny Got His Gun, and in the course of
writing the book I became acquainted with Trumbo’s son, who also worked on the
picture. Therefore, I’m not completely objective, so some of the virtues I see
in Johnny Got His Gun may not be
quite as visible to casual viewers. Adapted from Trumbo’s own novel, a
legendary antiwar story originally published in 1939, Johnny Got His Gun
is an impassioned personal statement about an important theme. That said, the movie
is challenging because of problems that stem not only from budgetary
limitations but also from Trumbo’s inexperience behind the camera—even though
he’d been working in Hollywood since the mid-1930s, Trumbo did not attempt
directing until this project, which he made when he was 65. And while it would
be heartening to report that Johnny Got His Gun represents one of the
great cinematic debuts of all time, it’s more accurate to say that the picture
is interesting because of its intentions. It must also be said, of course, that
the narrative is not inherently cinematic.
Set during World War I, the tale concerns
an unfortunate Colorado youth named Joe Bonham (Timothy Bottoms), who suffers
horrific battlefield injuries. In the “present day” scenes, Joe is an armless,
legless cripple; he also lost his ears, eyes, and mouth. What remains of Joe’s
body lies in a French hospital bed, and doctors spend endless amounts of time
trying to determine why Joe remains alive. Yet while the doctors believe Joe to
be unaware of his circumstances, his mind is still active and his sense of
touch allows him to develop a sort of communication—he can respond to taps on
his body, and can in turn lift his head back and forth to send Morse code
messages. The “present day” scenes are intercut with plaintive flashbacks to
the life Joe lost—his relationships with his father, mother, and girlfriend.
Many previous attempts to film Johnny Got His Gun ran aground, but as he
neared the end of his incredibly colorful career, Trumbo decided to adapt the
book himself. (Determination was nothing new for Trumbo; he’s the screenwriter
credited with breaking Hollywood’s anticommunist blacklist, of which he was an
early victim.) Some of Trumbo’s directorial flourishes work better in concept
than in practice, like shifting between color, black-and-white, and an
intermediary muted color scheme; the device has intellectual heft but little
emotional impact. Further, Trumbo’s lack of visual panache exacerbates the
claustrophobic nature of the story—a more experienced director could have
“opened up” the material without harming the spirit of the piece. The worst
shortcoming, however, probably involves Trumbo’s weak attempts to apply a
Fellini-esque veneer to certain dream sequences. Yet the underlying story is so
powerful, and the key performances are so heartfelt, that Johnny Got His Gun
packs a punch.
Bottoms delivers incredibly sensitive work when performing
onscreen in flashbacks and when voicing narration during the “present day”
scenes; the psychic pain his character experiences from start to finish is
harrowing. Jason Robards brings palpable world-weariness to the role of Joe’s
father, and cameo player Donald Sutherland offers a sly interpretation of Jesus
during a memorable hallucination scene. To his credit and detriment, Trumbo
honored the unrelentingly grim tone of the novel, which means Johnny Got His
Gun has integrity to burn but is also a tough picture to sit through. Nonetheless,
Johnny Got His Gun is a fittingly idiosyncratic statement from one of
the 20th century’s most irrepressible voices.
Johnny Got His Gun:
GROOVY
Just makes me think of Metallica.
ReplyDeleteOuch! You mean Aerosmith! ...
ReplyDeleteWell-made film with a depressing ending, and a rare example of a writer getting to actually direct a film based on a classic novel he himself wrote.
ReplyDelete