A posh drama that eventually morphs into a posh
thriller, Julia is made with such
consummate restraint and taste that it’s as delicate as silk. Alas, beautiful
photography and elegant words and graceful direction go only so far, even when
combined with strong performances by world-class actors, because, ultimately,
story is everything—and the story of Julia
is dull, episodic, and far-fetched. Adapted from a book by the venerable
Lillian Hellman, the movie depicts an episode in the late 1930s when Hellman allegedly
aided Germans who were resisting the rise of the Third Reich. Setting aside the
question of whether the events in question ever really happened—even the film’s
director, the venerable Fred Zinnemann, later expressed doubts about the
veracity of Hellman’s tale—the problem with Julia
is that it can’t decide whether it’s a quiet chamber piece or a wartime
adventure.
The movie has at least four major components. First is a long
prologue depicting young Lillian’s friendship with a sophisticated girl named
Julia. Next comes a long passage during which the adult Lillian (Jane Fonda)
becomes a famous writer under the tutelage of her lover/mentor, crime-fiction
legend Dashiell Hammett (Jason Robards). After that, Lillian ventures to
Europe, where she’s reunited with the grown-up Julia (Vanessa Redgrave) for a
passage depicting the subtle textures of adult frendship. And finally, the
movie shifts into intrigue mode when a rebel operative (Maximillian Schell)
enlists Lillian to carry a package through Nazi-occupied terrain. Seen
generously, this is the story of how Hellman’s character was built on the road
to performing a great deed of selfless heroism, but since even that reading
relegates the first half of the movie to the role of backstory, it becomes
obvious why the structure of the picture is so peculiar. After all, did the
makers of Casablanca (1942) have to
spend half the movie explaining Rick Blaine’s childhood so audiences would
understand his actions during the movie’s final scene?
Even
though Julia enjoyed considerable
acclaim during its original release—winning Oscars for Redgrave, Robards, and
screenwriter Alvin Sargent—it’s a tough film to love. For, while Julia contains many great things, from
Robards’ world-weary characterization to the gorgeous cinematography by
Douglas Slocombe, the various elements never cohere. Worse, the idea that
Hellman might have fabricated such an outlandishly self-aggrandizing narrative
leaves a bad taste on the palette. In any event, Julia
occupies an interesting place in pop-culture history, because it was upon
collecting her Academy Award for this film that Redgrave made her infamous
“Zionist hoodlums” speech during the 1978 Oscar broadcast.
Julia:
FUNKY
I'm sorry that Julia left a sour taste in your mouth - I think its great , classy filmmaking but c'est la vie. The real point of my commenting is that you left out what might end up being Julia's greatest claim to fame: it was Meryl Streep's film debut!
ReplyDeleteI do not understand how Vanessa Redgrave and Jason Robards won Oscars for this movie. Vanessa Redgrave is very good, but not Oscar Worthy and I do not know how Mr. Robards was even nominated for this. He was simply adequate as Hammett but that was it
ReplyDeleteRedgrave's performance is fine, but it's more of a starring role than a supporting one. Just like George Burns in '75, Redgrave was placed in the supporting category in order to ensure a win. The best supporting actress of the year was Tuesday Weld in "Looking for Mr. Goodbar."
ReplyDeleteQuite to the contrary, Redgrave was scarcely on-screen enough here even to justify the win, or nod, for the supporting category ... The fact that her character gave the film its title is immaterial ... It was Fonda's show beginning to end ... Needless to say, this scarcely kept Redgrave from making a fool of herself on the podium -- but of course that's a noble tradition extending back a long ways, and forward all the way to the present, what with Joaquin strugglingl mightily to make us all feel ever so guilty about putting cream in our coffee, just last month! ...
ReplyDeleteYour second assertion is likely very true, looking at the rest of the field that year ... Not having seen LfMr.G for many decades; I think I'll revisit that one imminently, Tuesday never failing to please ...