No genre epitomizes the anything-goes spirit of
the best American ’70s movies more than the downbeat character study, because during
the ’70s, actors resembling real people were given opportunities to play characters
resembling real people. Nothing could be further from traditional Hollywood glamour, for
instance, than Fat City, the
exceptional drama that revived director John Huston’s career. An ensemble piece
set in the agricultural fields and skid-row neighborhoods in and around
Stockton, California, Fat City is
filled with dreamers, drunks, and losers. It’s a hymn to the hopeless. Whereas
Huston had in the immediately preceding years lost his way by making bloated
and/or misguided projects including The
Bible: In the Beginning (1966) and Reflections
in a Golden Eye (1967), the director used Fat City to return to his core strength of poetic narratives about
people living on the fringes of society.
Although he didn’t write the piece
(Leonard Gardner adapted the script from his own novel), Fat City concerns themes that were deeply familiar to Huston,
including alienation, boxing, drinking, and failure. So even if one doesn’t get
the sense of the director seeing himself in the film’s characters, one intuits
that he’s known the type of people whose sad exploits he puts onscreen. Working
with a skillful crew including master cinematographer Conrad Hall, Huston generates
utterly believable atmosphere, with every dirty location and every tattered
piece of costuming accentuating the theme of people whose lives comprise
hard-won dignity against a backdrop of desperation.
Stacy Keach stars as Billy
Tully, a washed-up boxer who decides to get himself together by going to a gym,
where he meets promising young fighter Ernie Munger (Jeff Bridges). Emboldened
by the idea of mentoring a beginner while restarting his own career, Billy
initiates a pathetic quasi-romance with a drunk named Oma (Susan Tyrrell). As
the story progresses, Billy waffles between his real life, which involves
arduous work picking fruit for meager pay, and his imagined life, which
involves optimistic notions about a future with a surrogate family including
Ernie and Oma. Fat City is primarily
concerned with the ways in which people who have nothing latch onto
possibilities. Similarly to how Billy entertains foolish notions of being a
better fighter in middle age than he ever was as a youth, Ernie buys into
Billy’s encouragement, and Oma pretends that what she has with Billy is genuine—even
though she’s already involved with another man. Yet Gardner’s story doesn’t oversimplify
these desolate characters by focusing myopically on their inability to improve
their situations; quite to the contrary, Gardner illustrates every
self-destructive tendency of these characters, such as Billy’s habit of blaming
his circumstances on bad management. Every person in Fat City seems achingly real.
Huston cast the picture beautifully,
getting letter-perfect work out of nearly everyone in the film. Keach’s unique
combination of a bruiser’s physicality and a romantic’s soul transforms the
actor into Billy; within his first few scenes, Keach erases any audience
knowledge of his aptitude for classical dialogue, creating the complete illusion
of a broken-down slob living on the streets of Stockton. Tyrrell
gives an equally powerful performance (for which she earned an Oscar
nomination), her raspy voice and wild eyes conveying a woman lost to alcohol
but not robbed of her humanity, while Bridges and costar Candy Clark provide youthful
counterpoints to the main characters. (It’s not hard to imagine the people
played by Bridges and Clark becoming like Billy and Oma later in life.) As for
Huston, his artistic rejuvenation continued—although he made a few turkeys in
the years after Fat City, he also
made some of his most interesting pictures, including the challenging chamber
pieces Wise Blood (1979), Under the Volcano (1984), and The Dead (1987), all of which are
thematic cousins to Fat City.
Fat
City: RIGHT ON
Right on indeed! FAT CITY has a late-night loser vibe like a Tom Waits song or a Bukowski story.
ReplyDeleteYep, love this one! And thanks to your wonderful writing Peter, I'm going to have to pull this one off the shelf and give it a view. Been a while.
ReplyDelete