Watching Robert Altman’s ’70s movies, I often get
the sense of a director who believed his own hype—to say nothing of a critical
community and a fan base determined to attribute every move Altman made with
great significance. Perhaps because his work on M*A*S*H (1970) hit such a sweet spot of political satire, supporters
seemed determined to describe each subsequent Altman film as proof of his
genius. For instance, Thieves Like Us
has long enjoyed a solid reputation as an insightful character piece about
Depression-era crooks whose lives are filled with despair, ignorance, and
longing. On the plus side, the movie does indeed fit that description. On the
minus side, Thieves Like Us arrived
midway through a long string of similar movies, all made in the wake of Bonnie and Clyde (1967). So, while Thieves Like Us is unquestionably made
with more artistry than, say, the average Roger Corman-produced Bonnie and Clyde rip-off, the subject
matter and themes are so familiar that it’s mystifying why people make a fuss
over Thieves Like Us. Because, quite
frankly, if the most noteworthy aspects of the picture are Altman’s atmospheric
direction and the spirited acting of the quirky cast, Altman did atmosphere
better in other films (especially 1971’s McCabe
& Mrs. Miller) and all of his pictures feature spirited acting by
quirky casts. Oh, well.
In any event, this beautifully shot but overlong and
underwhelming drama follows three crooks who break out of a Mississippi prison
and begin a bank-robbing spree. They are Bowie (Keith Carradine), a young
romantic; Chicamaw (John Schuck), a hot-tempered thug; and T-Dub (Bert Remsen),
an old coot with a big ego and a bad limp. Between jobs, the crooks try to
build home lives, though everyone in the universe of these characters knows
violent death is inevitable. Making the most of his time outside of jail, T-Dub
inappropriately courts a much younger woman to whom he’s related. Meanwhile,
Bowie romances Keechie (Shelley Duvall), the no-nonsense daughter of a fellow
criminal. In his characteristically subversive fashion, Altman demonstrates
only marginal interest in the actual criminality of his characters—most of the
robberies happen off-camera, with Altman training his lens on cars and streets
while the soundtrack features excerpts from old ’30s radio shows.
This raises
the inevitable question of why Altman bothered to make a movie about a subject
he found boring, as well as the question of why it took three screenwriters
(Altman, Joan Tewkesbury, Calder Willingham) to adapt Edward Anderson’s novel.
And for that matter, why does a movie containing so little narrative material
sprawl over 123 minutes? The answer to that last one, of course, is that Altman
indulges himself on every level, letting scenes drag on endlessly and also including
dozens of his signature slow zoom-in shots. That said, the performances are
strange and vivid, with several Altman regulars (Carradine, Duvall, Schuck, Tom
Skerritt) joined by Louise Fletcher and others. Each does something at least
moderately interesting. Taken strictly on its story merits, Thieves Like Us is so threadbare that it’s
best to accept the piece as an exercise in cinematic style. Whether you find
the style infuriating or intoxicating will determine the sort of experience you
have with Thieves Like Us.
Thieves
Like Us: FUNKY
Underwhelming indeed, and I'm one of those that loves most '70s Altman!
ReplyDeleteNick Ray did it better. His first film, They Live by Night, was the first adaptation of Anderson's novel.
ReplyDelete