Although the success of
the blaxploitation genre created tremendous employment opportunities for
African-American actors (and filmmakers), the genre propagated so many
stereotypes that several enterprising producers recognized opportunities for
counterprogramming. For example, the domestic comedy Five on the Black Hand Side takes a lighthearted look at the
tensions within a middle-class black family in Los Angeles. Not a dealer or
pimp is in sight, and there’s nary a hint of inner-city blight or rampant
poverty. Five on the Black Hand Side
explores the affluent (or at least comfortable) side of American black life
circa the early ’70s. Adapted by Charlie L. Russell from his play of the same
name—without any distracting traces of its stage origins remaining—the picture
explores the novel premise of a family practicing civil disobedience against
their patriarch to force positive change.
Said patriarch is John Henry Brooks
(Leonard Jackson), a self-made success who runs his household like an empire.
“Mr. Brooks,” as he insists on being called, dresses in three-piece suits,
scorns the way his adult children embrace Afrocentrism, and treats his wife
like a personal assistant instead of a spouse. The joke is that instead of being
a captain of industry, Mr. Brooks is merely the proprietor of a neighborhood
barbershop—respectable, no question, but hardly grandiose. When the story
begins, Mr. Brooks’ overbearing leadership style has alienated nearly all of
his relatives. His youngest son, Gideon (Glynn Turman), has moved out of the
family apartment to live on a rooftop. His oldest son, Booker T. (D’Urville
Martin), has left the house entirely. His daughter, Gail (Bonnie Banfield), has
raised Mr. Brooks’ ire by insisting on an African-style wedding to her fiancé.
And Mrs. Brooks (Clarice Taylor) breaks down in tears every day because her
husband is so cold and imperious.
As the story progresses, Mrs. Brooks’
children and friends encourage her to revolt, so she stages protests and walkouts,
insisting Mr. Brooks sign a list of demands. Meanwhile, Mr. Brooks finds
support among his male buddies, who encourage him to stand his ground. Five on the Black Hand Side moves along
at a leisurely pace, lingering on long scenes that depict the texture of
everyday life in the Brooks’ neighborhood—Mr. Brooks and his pals tell boastful
stories in the barbershop, while Mrs. Brooks and her friends gossip in the
beauty parlor. And in one of the movie’s best scenes, Booker T. and Gideon
tussle over the thorny issues of assimilation and miscegenation—Black Power
advocate Gideon calls Booker T. a traitor to the race because Booker T. has a
white girlfriend. The way that Russell and director Oscar Williams jam
signifiers and topics into the story gives Five
on the Black Hand Side heft, even though the picture is largely designed as
light entertainment. And entertaining it is, thanks to charming performances
and spirited writing.
Five on the Black Hand Side: GROOVY
Gee whiz how can i see this? And what does that title mean?
ReplyDeleteJust watching this now on Brown Sugar streaming site. Hadn't realized it was originally a play, thanks for blogging on this!
ReplyDeleteThe title comes from a child's rhyme that was popular in the '70s---it went, "Gimme five on the black hand side", meaning that if you were black, you'd stick out your hand, someone would say, "Gimme five," then you'd flip your hand over and the other person would say, "On The Black Hand Side", and slap your hand again, I guess. They they would say, "Gimme a hole", and you'd form your hand into a circle to stick your finger in. There was one last line, but I can't remember it.
ReplyDeleteIt was just a little game kids played when I was little. The term, "Gimme five", was when black folks would agree with each other by one sticking out their hand, and the other slapping it in agreement. That all being said, this is a pretty damn good film---it's funny, well-made, acted and very topical for its era, and proof that not all films made about black people in the '70s were blaxploitation films, which is the impression that's always given about films about black people from this era---and which isn't true. Plus, this film was also written and directed by black people, which makes it even more interesting.