A psychological drama
that’s neither psychologically revelatory nor dramatically interesting, the
European-made Secrets might never
have reached American screens, because it’s hard to imagine U.S. viewers
getting excited about 92 minutes of poorly written and sloppily filmed ennui.
However, British actress Jacqueline Bisset unexpectedly transitioned from
decorative starlet to full-fledged sex symbol thanks to The Deep (1977), a box-office hit that prominently featured the
voluptuous Bisset wearing a wet T-shirt. Secrets,
which was originally titled Adultery,
features Bisset nude in one scene, so the film’s producers unleashed the film
on the American market in early 1978, bogusly marketing the picture as erotica.
Bisset, understandably, was not pleased. Cowritten and directed by Englishman
Philip Saville, the picture stars Bisset as Jennifer Wood, a bored housewife
whose husband, Allan (Robert Powell), is a failed actor reluctantly pursuing an
office job. While Allan trudges through an all-day job interview, Jennifer
ditches their preteen daughter, Judy (Tarka Kings). Then Jennifer wanders
around a city park and mopes, eventually meeting a wealthy middle-aged man
named Raoul Kramer (Per Oscarsson). He talks Jennifer into visiting his nearby
home.
Turns out Raoul is a widower, and Jennifer is a doppelganger of his dead
wife. As the afternoon unfolds, Saville tediously cuts back and forth between
the activities of Allan, Jennifer, and Judy. Allan fumbles the interview but
flirts with his interviewer, Beatrice (Shirley Knight). Jennifer dresses up
like Raoul’s dead wife and sleeps with him. Judy hangs out with a neighbor, who
gives her a plant. Except for some pretentious dialogue and voiceover, that’s
all that happens in Secrets, and even
the heavily marketed nude scene is underwhelming. Bisset is indeed exposed and
glorious, but the scene comprises tame postcoital cuddling, and it’s unpleasant
to watch the 17-years-older Oscarsson manhandle Bisset. Secrets isn’t smut, but Saville’s filmmaking is so inept—and the
portrayals are so trite—that the movie is deeply boring. Worse, the knowledge
of how Bisset’s participation was misrepresented gives the movie a distasteful
quality; what the actress undoubtedly presumed to be grown-up drama somehow
morphed into lurid exploitation.
Secrets:
LAME
What is it about movies named Secrets? I recall a 1977 TV movie of that name about a woman who turns nymphomaniac, although she's played by Susan Blakely, so she's a classy nymphomaniac. The man who wrote it had already written over two dozen episodes of I Dream of Jeannie. I recall it as glamorous, silly, and insubstantial -- in fact, "glamorous, silly, and insubstantial" could probably use some short snappy label as a movie subgenre.
ReplyDelete