Speaking as a cineaste, a
devotee of ’70s film, and a screenwriter, I’m about to commit an act of heresy
by admitting that I don’t dig The
Hospital, which netted Paddy Chayefsky one of his three writing Oscars. While I understand the use of dark satire to
skewer the foibles of the medical industry—and, on a larger scale, the foibles of
bureaucracy and capitalism run amok—I’ve watched The Hospital twice at very different times in my life, and on both
occasions I’ve found the movie to be cold, pretentious, and tiresome. Seeing as
how Chayefsky’s writing was singled out for praise, it’s possible my reaction stems from a problem of execution. Arthur Hiller’s sloppy
camerawork and undisciplined dramaturgy prevents a clear point of view from
coalescing, so he seems lost as the story zooms back and forth between tonalities.
Proving that giving an ambitious Chayevsky script a
pleasing shape wasn’t impossible, Sidney Lumet made a masterpiece from
Chayefsky’s next opus, Network
(1976). Many of the outrageous narrative maneuvers that make Network so wonderful are present in The Hospital, but they don’t work nearly
as well. The omniscient narration, the religious allegory, the spectacular
monologues—whereas these elements feel germane to the coherent lunacy of Network, they contribute to making The Hospital feel scattershot. The Hospital is not without its virtues,
of course, because George C. Scott’s leading performance is impassioned, and
the movie’s dialogue vibrates with Chayefsky’s unique blend of indignation and
intellectualism (even though all of the characters sound identical). Furthermore, the best jabs at the medical industry land with
tremendous impact. Taken as a whole, however, The Hospital is contrived, episodic, long-winded, and
underwhelming.
The picture is set at a fictional Manhattan hospital, which is
perpetually surrounded by protestors, some of whom also work at the facility.
Chief of Medicine Dr. Herbert Bock (Scott) is a suicidal drunk reeling from a
divorce, and therefore emotionally unprepared for a series of crises. One by
one, doctors and nurses start dying as a result of absurd mix-ups—injections
given to the wrong patients, sick people pushed aside and “forgotten to death,”
and so on. Herbert’s life takes a turn when he meets Barbara Drummond (Diana Rigg), the
daughter of an eccentric patient. A hippie involved with Native American
mysticism, she tries to remove her father from the hospital, sparking many
debates about the efficacy of Herbert’s management. Other subplots include the
travails of one Dr. Welbeck (Richard Dysart), a snobbish surgeon who has
incorporated himself in order to prioritize money over medicine. All of these
things come together in wild ways. A serial killer stalks the hospital’s halls.
Herbert confesses self-destructive thoughts to a shrink, nearly injects himself
with lethal chemicals, and overcomes impotence by raping Barbara.
In one of the film’s least pleasing developments, Barbara interprets Herbert’s sexual assault as an act of love. Suffice to say the film is not as sharp on women’s issues as it is on economics and medical ethics.
In one of the film’s least pleasing developments, Barbara interprets Herbert’s sexual assault as an act of love. Suffice to say the film is not as sharp on women’s issues as it is on economics and medical ethics.
While The Hospital is all over the place in
terms of mood and themes, Scott is incredible, even if the
script requires him to exclaim “Oh, my God!” a few too many times, and the
supporting cast is filled with lively players. Beyond Dysart and Rigg, The Hospital features
Roberts Blossom, Stockard Channing, Stephen Elliot, Katherine Hellmond, Barnard Hughes, Nancy
Marchand, Frances Sternhagen, and Robert Walden. Moreover, the movie has unquestionable
literary quality, and it’s a meticulously researched examination of a worthy
topic. Yet it’s also bewildering and strident and ugly. Still, what else could
be expected from a self-proclaimed examination of “the whole wounded madness of
our times”? Happily, Chayefsky found a perfect vessel for his op-ed rage in his next project.
The Hospital: FUNKY
I, too, tried to enjoy this movie. The performances are very good, in the case of Scott, he is down right Brilliant. I think the Oscar Winning Script is oddly the weak link in this film. It is way to cerebral to be in this type of film. I thought it was an attempt at Black Comedy, but it is very depressing at times.
ReplyDeleteGive me Peter Seller's 'Where Does it Hurt?',over this overrated film any day. And yes I realize that I'm in a minority on the admiration of that film.
ReplyDelete