In some respects, Canadian
filmmaker David Cronenberg took a step backward with Rabid, the second of his myriad biological-horror sagas and his
fourth theatrical feature overall. Whereas the director’s previous bio-horror
picture, 1975’s Shivers a/k/a They Came from Within, is suffused with
Cronenberg’s distinctively clinical approach, Rabid is more obviously derivative, borrowing stylistic and
thematic tropes from sources including the work of American gore maven George
A. Romero. Rabid also lacks
Cronenberg’s usual storytelling sophistication, suffering from halfhearted
characterization, as well as stop-and-start pacing. Nonetheless, Rabid is still a nasty jolt of
sexualized violence, and better by far than the average drive-in schlock of the
same era—even mediocre Cronenberg is basically worthwhile. Better still, the
creative growth the director demonstrated with his next bio-horror story,
1979’s The Brood, was extraordinary;
after that, he was off and running on an impressive streak that carried him all
the way to the acclaimed Dead Ringers
(1988).
Like so many of Cronenberg’s movies, Rabid begins with experimental medicine. At the institute bearing
his name, Dr. Dan Keloid (Howard Ryshpan) employs chemically treated grafts to
create quasi-artificial skin tissue during plastic surgery. When a young couple
suffers a terrible motorcycle accident near the institute. Dr. Keloid employs
his risky technique on badly wounded Rose (Marilyn Chambers). Upon awaking
after surgery, Rose becomes a sort of mutant vampire, having grown a
vagina-like orifice in her armpit that emits a probe capable of sucking blood
from other people’s bodies. The movie’s title stems from a major subplot, in
which the virus carried by Rose spreads to other victims, resulting in
quarantines and other draconian responses by the government, recalling Romero’s
The Crazies (1973).
Whereas the best
Cronenberg movies wrestle with profound ethical issues, Rabid is more of a traditional shocker in the Frankenstein mold—a doctor unwittingly transforms an innocent
victim into a deadly monster that must be stopped. As such, there’s a lot of
herky-jerky rhythm as the movie idles through dialogue scenes in between
attacks. Rabid ultimately works, both
in terms of shock value and suspense, but it’s not especially original or
provocative, notwithstanding the aforementioned weird appendage. Among other
problems, the music is generic and shrill, because Cronenberg had not yet begun
his fruitful collaboration with composer Howard Shore, who bathed many of the
director’s subsequent films with aural landscapes full of elegant dread. One
more aspect of Rabid that’s worth
noting is the presence of leading lady Chambers, appearing in her first
mainstream movie after achieving fame in the porn blockbuster Behind the Green Door (1972). She’s fine
here, and even affecting at times, though her frequent nude scenes indicate she
was hired for her lack of inhibitions as much as for her acting talent.
Rabid:
FUNKY
RABID was produced at a time when the Canadian film industry was desperate for its product to be picked up by the U.S. majors.
ReplyDeleteTo this end, a tax shelter scheme was introduced whereby Canadian filmmakers could undercut the American competition when it came to selling their product in the U.S.
It didn't work. RABID, along with 3 other Canadian horror/exploiters- DEATH WEEKEND, THE KEEPER and Cronenberg's SHIVERS - were all passed over by the big boys in the U.S.
This lack of major interest proved a blessing in the U.K. for indie distributor Alpha for whom Rabid was one of their early successes.