Released a year before The Exorcist (1973), this intense
thriller offers a much different approach to similar subject matter. Virtually
no special effects were used for The
Possession of Joel Delaney, and the spirit inhabiting the title character
belongs not to a demon but to a person. Elegantly photographed, intelligently
written, and filled with credible performances, The Possession of Joel Delaney treats its outlandish storyline
with respect—so even though the film isn’t especially frightening, it makes for
an immersive viewing experience. And while The
Possession of Joel Delaney is not up to The
Exorcist’s level, it’s still fun to play the contrast-and-compare game. The
earlier picture is insinuating and restrained, while the latter is
confrontational and spectacular. What both films share the deeply frightening
notion of losing control over one’s soul.
Set in New York City, The Possession of Joel Delaney revolves,
as does The Exorcist, around a woman
who watches in terror as a loved one succumbs to possession. In this case, the
woman is Norah Benson (Shirley MacLaine), an affluent mother of two. (The
children’s father doesn’t figure into the story.) Norah worries about her
younger brother, Joel Delaney (Perry King), a handsome twentysomething who
seems adrift in his life. Then an incident reveals that she has reason to
worry—after Joel is arrested for attacking a man, Joel claims he has no memory
of committing the crime. Norah arranges to get Joel freed from jail so long as
he sees a therapist, but Joel insists he’s fine. Later, when a woman of his
acquaintance is murdered, clues suggest an unhinged Joel was the killer.
However, clues also point to an at-large Cuban immigrant. Conveniently, Norah
has a Cuban maid, so the maid introduces Norah to the world of Santería and the
possibility that the Cuban immigrant’s spirit entered Joel’s body.
The Possession of Joel Delaney takes its
time during the investigative phase of the narrative, allowing ambiguity to
seep into the storytelling. MacLaine thrives here, showing how her character
struggles to comprehend things way behind her normal experience. She’s also
fierce and understandably terrified during the film’s creepy finale. King,
appearing in his first movie, does well playing a willful young man whose first
manifestations of possession seem like mere petulance to those around him. If
there’s a big flaw to the film, besides some sketchy gore effects, it’s that
neither King nor the filmmakers create much empathy for the Joel character—a
greater sense of what is lost by the corruption of Joel’s soul would have
deepened the film’s emotional impact. As is, the picture is tense and
unnerving, but it lacks the pathos that made The Exorcist work. That said, The
Possession of Joel Delaney is among the rare horror pictures
that take themselves seriously without seeming ridiculous for doing so.
The Possession of Joel Delaney: GROOVY
I don't think I would have bothered with this movie, then I read your review. Now I can't wait to see it!
ReplyDeletePeter, I watched this last night and was totally happy with it! Sure it's not perfect but its conviction carries it through. MacLaine and King are terrific. Couple fantastic scenes of shock and horror that I *loved*. Gotta read the novel now! Thanks man.
ReplyDeleteAbsurd plotting with MacLaine leaving her children alone with their disturbed uncle who she already bailed out of Bellevue and she certainly must suspect he decapitated his girlfriend! And when in danger the heroine flees to a remote off season beach house and guess who shows up? Also, the scene of the young boy being forced to strip and dance is disturbing and very questionable. The incestuous relationship between Joel and MacLaine never really pans out. A poor film.
ReplyDeleteThis didn't ever really cohere for me somehow -- but maybe I need to see it again ... Incidentally, your site lacks an entry for Hussein's fairly famous previous film , "Melody" ('71) ... (That one was British -- so maybe it's not here because it didn't have a real US theatrical release, I have no idea -- since I believe your FAQ said that's your policy...)
ReplyDelete