It’s easy to forget that
two different Hollywood stories occurred during the early ’70s. In the more familiar
narrative, the collapse of the studio system allowed young filmmakers to insert
their perspective, resulting in the groundbreaking achievements of the New
Hollywood. At the same time, veteran professionals perpetuated the old
ways of doing things, resulting in bloated super-productions that have since
been largely forgotten. One such epic is The
Great Waltz, a musical biopic about the classical-music composer Johann
Strauss Jr. and a loose remake of the 1938 movie bearing the same name. To indicate
how out of step this movie was with the tastes of 1972 audiences, one need only
note that the film’s writer and director, Andrew L. Stone, made this picture
two years after helming yet another flop musical, Song of Norway (1970). Why did anyone expect different results the second time around? Running an almost
interminable two hours and 15 minutes, complete with intermission, this G-rated
melodrama tracks Strauss’ conflicts with his overbearing father, his clashes
with people who don’t believe in his talent, and his various romantic
entanglements. In other words, the usual soapy formula. Playing Strauss is the
handsome German actor Horst Bucholz, whose icy quality ensures that the picture
feels clinical instead of personal, and even though the title of the picture is
The Great Waltz, most of the musical
numbers revolve around singing. Sure, there’s a lot of dancing, too, but Stone
lets dippy lyrics, rather than expressive body movements, tell the story. Even
the narration is sung. The Great Waltz
is not as painfully saccharine as Song of
Norway, and it’s all the worse for the difference—The Great Waltz is so polite and stilted as to barely exist. It’s
all spectacular locations and predictable dramatic rhythms and robotic acting,
archaic techniques in the service of a ho-hum narrative. Perhaps that explains
why Stone never made another movie.
The Great Waltz: LAME
No comments:
Post a Comment