Ostensibly adapted from a
1971 novel by Will Stanton but in most respects a shameless clone of the Frank
Capra-directed classic It’s a Wonderful
Life (1945), this harmless live-action comedy from Walt Disney Productions
takes place in a generic Midwestern city during the Depression. Uptight
hardware-store proprietor Charley (Fred MacMurray) focuses so much on work that
he’s become alienated from his three kids. Meanwhile, his long-suffering wife,
Nettie (Cloris Leachman), longs for the adventure of visiting the World’s Fair
in Chicago. One day, Charley escapes a series of near-fatal accidents and then
encounters an angel (Harry Morgan), who explains that he’s been tasked with
collecting Charley’s soul. Charley begs for time in which to settle his
affairs, and you can guess what happens next—the brush with morality makes
Charley realize how much he has to live for, so he becomes a better father,
husband, and person, thereby improving his chances of earning a celestial
reprieve. Whereas It’s a Wonderful Life
goes dark and deep with themes of self-doubt and suicide, Charley and the Angel goes shallow and soothing by suggesting that
any individual who makes a sincere effort can dramatically improve the
circumstances of his or her life. If only that were so.
In some ways, Charley and the Angel is quite
palatable. The storyline is coherent and linear, even with the goofy subplot
about Charley’s sons inadvertently becoming bootleggers. Production values are
excellent, despite the rickety process shots during car scenes; there’s even a
certain hokey charm to the old-school FX used during scenes of the angel
floating through the air and moving objects while invisible. As helmed by the
reliable Vincent McEveety, the picture moves along briskly, lingering on
important emotional moments just long enough for skilled actors to imbue their
characters with humanity. Unsurprisingly, Morgan is the standout because he
gets most of the jokes, and his cranky/sweet vibe is appealing. Leachman
does respectable work in a thankless role, while Kurt Russell, playing a boy who courts Charley’s daughter, provides bland earnestness. As for
MacMurray, he lends a somewhat bewildering energy—or rather a somewhat
bewildering lack of energy. He’s so calm, even when insane things are happening, that he nearly becomes a caricature of the unflappable Disney dad
archetype.
Charley and the Angel: FUNKY
Remember that the average person in 1973 likely had never seen IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE or, of they had, had forgotten it! It was just a flop from 3 decades earlier, after all, not yet the holiday classic that it would become in a few years when it was rediscovered and aired on network TV for the first time.
ReplyDeleteAMusing to imagine someone watching this on TV and wondering where Bosley is...
ReplyDeleteInteresting that Russell is referred to as a boy. By the time this movie came out he was 22. Also around this time, Russell had been playing minor league baseball for two years during the summers. He didn't do too bad but injured his rotator cuff ending his career.
ReplyDelete