The minor values of the dance drama Nijinksy, set in the world of European
ballet circa the early 20th century, have dimmed with time, and it’s not as if Nijinsky ever enjoyed much critical
goodwill. From a thematic standpoint, the most significant aspect of the film
is not its depiction of ballet, but rather its presentation of
a gay relationship. The title character is a volatile diva considered the
greatest dancer of his generation, and his lover is the domineering and
petulant director of the storied Ballets Russes. Yet while there’s never any
ambiguity as to whether these characters are a couple, director Herbert Ross
takes an arm’s-length approach to intimacy, so most of the relationship
manifests in bitter arguments and vengeful manipulations, reducing an interpersonal dynamic to the cheap rhythms of a campy soap opera. If Nijinksy felt the least bit bold in
1980, it seems tame (or worse) today.
A parallel issue is Ross’ proclivity
toward “pretty pictures,” to borrow a phrase from another
dancer-turned-director, Bob Fosse. Everything about Nijinsky is beautiful, from the fluid movements of dancers to the
opulent costumes and locations to the supple music and photography. Even
moments intended to seem atonal, such as an erotic dance set to dissonant music
by Stravisnky, are pristine. Coupled with the timid approach to sexuality, this
uptight aesthetic makes Nijinsky antiseptic,
not exactly the right quality for a story about the repercussions of romantic
torment. Yet it’s not as if the film lacks pleasures, and in fact, many
of the overly mannered qualities that suppress the movie’s emotionality add to
its purely sensual appeal. Ross films dance well, so whenever Nijinsky focuses on re-creations of the
title character’s famous performances, one can marvel at the artistry and
athleticism on display. Similarly, the endless procession of evening gowns,
gilded furnishings, grand staircases, and tuxedos generates a certain
intoxicating quality; like a Merchant-Ivory production, Nijinsky has a strong element of lifestyle porn.
As for the story,
which should be fascinating but is not, the narrative tracks the slow decline
of Vaslav Nijinsky (George de la Peña) from fame to madness. At the beginning
of the movie, he’s at the apex of his celebrity, but he bristles at limitations
placed on him by lover/mentor Sergei Diaghilev (Alan Bates). Nijinsky agitates
to become a choreographer as well as a dancer, even as circumstances compel
Nijinsky to rebel against his sexuality by exploring relationships with women.
It’s all quite turgid, more so because of de la Peña’s competent
but forgettable work. Ross and the
screenwriters never get a bead on what makes Nijinsky tick, so his descent into
schizophrenia unfolds lifelessly. In the end, only Bates’ thorny supporting
performance and a few moments of onstage spectacle resonate.
Nijinsky:
FUNKY
Now, if it was called 'Ninja-sky', they would've been on to something!
ReplyDelete