Figuring
out why the intelligent comedy Once in
Paris . . . failed to score at the box office doesn’t take much work. After alienating fans by leaving the hit sitcom M*A*S*H in 1975 and then floundering through inconsequential TV
projects, Wayne Rogers didn’t bring much goodwill to his first big-screen starring role. Leading lady Gayle Hunnicut wasn’t a major draw, either. And the folks tasked with selling the picture faced a daunting
challenge: Despite containing a storyline about a sexual affair, Once in Paris . . . is primarily a bromance pairing Rogers with
Gallic charmer Jack Lenoir. All in all, it’s amazing the
picture got made. Nonetheless, those willing to accept the film on its own terms
might enjoy what they discover.
Michael Moore (Rogers) is an American
screenwriter summoned to Paris for a rewrite job. He’s
met at the airport by chauffeur Jean-Paul (Lenoir), who personifies joie de vivre. To Jean-Paul, every
traffic jam is an adventure, every beautiful woman is a miracle, and every new
day is an opportunity for drinking and gambling and laughter. First Michael
keeps Jean-Paul at arm’s length, opting to focus on work. But once it becomes
clear the rewrite won’t take much effort, Michael accepts Jean-Paul’s
invitation to see the real Paris: playing petanque in parks with old men, placing wagers at a horse track, visiting the restaurant that Jean-Paul’s
mistress owns, and so on. Eventually, Michael’s new friendship creates
problems. When the lonely screenwriter becomes preoccupied with Susan (Hunnicut), an aristocratic beauty staying in the same hotel, Michael heeds Jean-Paul’s advice to pursue a tryst, even though Michael has a wife and
children back in Los Angeles. And so it goes from there.
Flaws plague this film. Michael
is condescending, fragile, reckless, and self-involved, with retrograde attitudes toward women. Moreover, Susan is portrayed as a vapid slut despite Gilroy’s weak attempts at rounding out her characterization. By
current cultural standards, Once in Paris
. . . is offensive. Viewed through the prism of its time, however, the
movie has personality and soulfulness, even if one suspects that Gilroy would have preferred Jack Lemmon in the lead rather than the bland Rogers. Finally, it’s
worth noting that Gilroy notched a WGA Award nomination for his script, because
his peers likely reacted to the film’s strongest element: the delightful
rendering of Jean-Paul as an amiable rake whom a straightlaced family
man might dream of someday befriending.
Once in Paris . . . : FUNKY
Special thanks to reader Jason K. for providing a copy of this rarity!
ReplyDeleteI've seen this film a couple of times on TV over the ears and found it a pleasant enough diversion. Wayne Rogers projects a low key masculinity that's not off putting and Gayle Hunnicutt is a va-va-va-voom world class beauty. I'm surprised she didn't have a bigger film career.
ReplyDeleteVery welcome! Sounds like it's a little more interesting than most synopses online give it credit for. The thing I like about a lot of these misfires is imagining how they could be made into better movies...
ReplyDeleteBelieve it or not, Gayle Hunnicutt was not British, but American. She moved to England when she married actor David Hemmings. There were several points in her career where she seemed poised to hit it big but she never did. A good solid career, though.
ReplyDeleteGayle Hunnicut was class personified. So stunning in EYE OF THE CAT. Once in Paris is a guilty pleasure
ReplyDeleteAnyone find it mildly ironic that his co-star in this had the same name of the character that replaced him on MASH? Must be just me.
ReplyDelete