More or less watchable
because if its charismatic leading actors, but otherwise quite rotten thanks to
limp comedy and primitive gender attitudes, I
Will, I Will . . . for Now attempts to paint a raucous picture of marriage
in the ’70s. Elliot Gould and Diane Keaton play estranged spouses who attempt
reconciliation by commissioning a detailed legal contract that spells out their
respective responsibilities, and their scheme gets sidetracked because both
spouses pursue relationships outside the marriage. Cue lots of remarks from
Gould’s character about why it’s okay that he flirts with the sexy neighbor who
lives downstairs, and lots of shrewish whining from Keaton’s character about
why her husband needs to spend more time talking about his feelings. As
cowritten and directed by old-school comedy pro Norman Panama, once a gag
writer for Bob Hope’s radio shows, I
Will, I Will . . . for Now gives voice to ideologies that must have seemed
positively regressive when the movie was originally released; watched today,
the picture’s not quite cringe-inducing, but it’s close.
Les Bingham (Gould) is
financially successful but romantically frustrated, because he’s still in love
with his wife, Katie (Keaton). Alas, she’s moved on to someone new, whom Les
doesn’t realize is Les’ best friend and lawyer, Lou Springer (Paul Sorvino). When
Les and Katie attend an offbeat commitment ceremony together, they both react
to the nation of partners laying out expectations through a contract rather
than simply mouthing old-fashioned marriage vows. Les persuades Katie to give
their romance another shot, at which point the believability and logic of the
story utterly disappears. Literally the instant that Katie moves back into Les’
building, his eyes nearly pop out of his head while he ogles Jackie Martin
(Victoria Principal), a onetime Playboy
centerfold who lives a few floors below Les. Then, despite a few interludes of
romantic outings and sexual bliss, Les resumes bad habits—ignoring Katie,
smoking smelly cigars, watching sports incessantly, etc. He also spends time in
Jackie’s apartment, even accepting a copy of The Joy of Sex from her. This is Les’ idea of reconciliation?
Panama weakly mimics the manner in which Billy Wilder used actors including Jack Lemmon to make his sex-farce stories sing, for example throwing in a running
joke about Les’ bad back, and the movie revolves around the idea that women can’t resist men who behave like Neanderthals. By the
time the movie culminates in an elaborate sequence at a sex-therapy
retreat, Panama has succumbed to male wish fulfillment, creating a scenario by
which Les can romp around a bedroom with Jackie free of guilt—while still
preserving a chance of keeping Katie. Oy. Gould does what he can, faring best
in the film’s loosest scenes, while Keaton seems adrift without the benefit of
a real role to play. Principal is merely ornamental, but Sorvino does well,
even spicing some scenes with opera singing.
I Will, I Will . . . for Now: FUNKY
After searching out this film for several decades, I finally found it on ITunes after being given a gift-card. While I was bound to be disappointed with the film, the worst aspect of it is the unusual flatness of Diane Keaton's performance, especially given the track record she had up to this film. However, I was fascinated by the extremely short theme song that still managed to be lyrically repetitive.
ReplyDeleteTruly awful film. It's less entertaining than the average segment of ABCs Love American Style and so much longer. Not a funny line or situation in the entire film. It looks ugly and cheap and none of the performers has a chance. Gould should keep his shirt on!
ReplyDelete