Throughout his lengthy
career, William Castle’s cinematic efforts ranged from the sublime (producing
1968’s Rosemary’s Baby) to the
ridiculous (equipping theater seats with electronic buzzers in order to jolt
viewers during screenings of 1959’s The
Tingler). Much of his work fell between these extremes, because even though
Castle’s hucksterism often outpaced his artistry, there’s no denying the simple
pleasures of, say, 1959’s House on
Haunted Hill. Yet the last film that Castle directed, Shanks, exists in a weird little universe all its own. By any
reasonable critical estimation, it’s an utter disaster, because it’s predicated
on so many strange contrivances that it crumbles under the weight of its own
silliness. Furthermore, the use of family-friendly storytelling devices to
communicate a tale about reanimated corpses is as creepy as the movie’s implied
romance between a man in his 50s and a adolescent girl. Atop all that, the
movie’s leading performance—by famed French mime Marcel Marceau—is ridiculous.
Thing is, using reasonable critical estimations in order to appraise Shanks is beside the point. One can only
revel in the peculiarity of the thing, and marvel that Castle got someone to
fund such a deeply misguided enterprise.
First off, Shanks is a silent film. Except when it isn’t. After a title card
announces that “William Castle Presents a Grim Fairy Tale,” an opening scene
drenched with optical effects and syrupy music introduces viewers to Malcolm
Shanks (Marceau). A deaf and mute puppeteer who wants only to fill the world
with joy, Malcolm lives with his beastly sister, Mrs. Barton (Tsilla Chelton),
and her drunken husband, Mr. Barton (Philippe Clay). Inexplicably, the Bartons
live off money that Malcolm makes as a laborer, even though he seems to spend
most of time entertaining local children with puppet shows.
In the first of
many confusing plot twists, Malcolm answers a call to work for a man named
Walker (also played by Marceau), who is some sort of Dr. Frankenstein-like mad
scientist living in a castle near Malcolm’s village. (Never mind that Malcolm’s
“village” looks suspiciously like an American suburb.) Walker has concocted a
means of reviving dead animals, so when Walker dies, Malcolm reanimates his
friend. Then Malcolm goes on a killing spree, eventually reanimating several
corpses—which he controls through the use of a tiny electronic device—in order
to cover his tracks. Until a biker gang shows up at the castle. During all of
this nonsense, Malcolm woos a wholesome young girl named Celia (Cindy
Eibacher), though Castle is cryptic about whether Malcolm wants to be Celia’s
guardian or her lover.
Long stretches of Shanks
pass without dialogue (Castle even uses old-timey title cards), but then
full-dialogue scenes intrude periodically. If there’s a consistent aesthetic at
work, it’s hard to recognize. Additionally, the plotting gets so laborious that
at one point, Castle uses a title card to plug a narrative hole: “Old Walker
cannot attend Celia’s birthday party this evening because Malcolm (in a gesture
of mercy) buried his friend several days ago.” Huh? Never the most visually
sophisticated filmmaker, Castle enters the realm of outright incompetence at regular
intervals, sometimes employing the old Ed Wood trick of cutting to inanimate
objects in order to bridge jumps in camera coverage. Dreary, dull, morbid,
sloppy, and tasteless, Shanks is
unquestionably one of the oddest movies ever released by a major American
studio, in this case Paramount Pictures.
Shanks:
FREAKY
No comments:
Post a Comment