Despite running just 75
minutes, Malatesta’s Carnival of Blood—the
sole directorial endeavor of a filmmaker named Christopher Speeth—packs in a
whole lot of weirdness. The title suggests a schlocky gorefest in the Herschell
Gordon Lewis style, and, sure enough, there’s a fair measure of a
plasma-spilling violence on display. Yet there’s also a demented kind of
artistry at work here. Much of the action takes place in a surreal underground
community where flesh-eating zombies hang out in spaces that look as if they
were decorated by interior designers tripping on LSD. What’s more, the zombies
have peculiar pastimes in addition to chewing on people. In several scenes,
groups of zombies mash about on the equivalent of a dancefloor while watching
silent horror movies, including The
Hunchback of Notre Dame (1925), projected onto a wall. Eerie electronic
music provides the scoring for these scenes, so this movie’s version of zombie
culture comes across like the world’s worst round-the-clock rave.
As for those
aforementioned design elements, one standout is a VW Beetle hung upside down
from a ceiling, with the front doors removed and the interior lined with what
appears to be candy-apple-red bubble wrap, transforming the car into some kind
of psychedelic hammock; to complete the effect, the front hood hangs open, with
the hood and the exposed cargo space painted to resemble a giant mouth. Malatesta’s Carnival of Blood is full of such bizarre visual excess.
Inasmuch as it’s possible to follow the story—or, most
of it, anyway—the general idea is that a vampire named Mr. Blood (Jerome
Dempsey) and his insidious overlord, Malatesta (Daniel Dietrich), run a
carnival aboveground as a tool for luring victims into their subterranean
slaughterhouse. Various members of a family get jobs at the carnival so they
can look for a missing relative, whom they believe was last seen at the
carnival, so one by one the villains attack the family members. However, Malatesta’s Carnival of Blood is such an
amorphous, druggy film that the plot is inconsequential. Things just sort of happen, with the only real throughline being the
viewer’s journey, Dante’s Inferno-style,
through the assorted chambers of the underground lair.
It’s a safe bet some
extreme-cinema fans adore this picture, because Speeth either intentionally or
unintentionally breaks rules of cinematic storytelling even as he challenges
boundaries of good taste. The curious should be warned that event
though Malatesta’s Carnival of Blood
is photographed relatively well, it is in most other regards the work of a
primitive artistic mind, all indulgence and whim rather than discipline and
purpose. The patronizing way to absorb a picture like this is to laugh at its
incompetent aspects, and the “serious” way is to parse meaning from its crude
textures. With those being the available options, a third alternative—avoiding
the picture entirely—might be the wisest of all.
Malatesta’s Carnival of Blood: FREAKY
I'm the proud owner of a 1-sheet for this.
ReplyDeleteSounds like another possible gem I have never heard of.
ReplyDeleteThe name Malatesta means "evil-headed."
ReplyDeleteHonestly, this movie was just plain awful, and it was a complete mess. Most of the cast couldn't act worth a damn, with the exception of the actor who played Mr. Blood, and it's like the director didn't have a clue on how to put an actual story together. He had all these interesting story ideas, but didn't have a clue on how to shoot them or make anything. This film pretty much shows everything one should not do in order to make a film---it's that bad.
ReplyDelete