Fresh from his success with the two-part
swashbuckling epic The Three Musketeers
(1973) and The Four Musketeers
(1974), mischievous director Richard Lester turned his attention to an
original character created by his Musketeers
screenwriter, George MacDonald Fraser. An Englishman whose work often combined
history and high adventure, Fraser introduced the character of Sir Harry Paget
Flashman in his 1969 novel Flashman.
The first in a lengthy series of novels about the character, Flashman presented a 19th-century coward
who by ironic circumstance stumbles into a reputation as a hero. A self-serving
schemer who berates those beneath his station and swindles everyone above him,
Flashman is a uniquely British contrivance whose identity is defined by the
English class system. Given Lester’s penchant for insouciance, he was perfectly
suited to putting the irreverent character onscreen.
Unfortunately, miscasting
proved the movie’s undoing: Lester gambled by hiring Malcolm McDowell, the
gifted actor best known for his disturbing turn in Stanley Kubrick’s A Clockwork Orange (1971), but McDowell
made Flashman’s unbecoming qualities far too believable. As he connives women
into his bed, flees danger, tricks others into fighting his battles, and
whimpers at the slightest injury, the movie version of Flashman comes across
not as a clever survivor but rather as a feckless weasel. Accordingly, it’s
difficult to care whether he survives, just like it’s difficult to believe
he’ll end up accomplishing anything worthwhile. Had Lester gone whole-hog with
the comedic aspects of the picture, casting a funnyman like Peter Sellers, Royal Flash might have worked as a
farce, but since the picture includes scenes of genuine danger, the sum effect
is middling.
It doesn’t help that the episodic plot, borrowed from Fraser’s
second book in the series, Royal Flash
(1970), is a tired riff on Anthony Hope’s classic novel The Prisoner of Zenda. As happens to the hero of Hope’s book,
Flashman gets recruited to impersonate an endangered monarch in order to flush
out assassins, so Flashman spends half the story trying to slip away from his
dangerous assignment, and the other half reluctantly joining rebel forces
fighting the people who enlisted Flashman in the first place. It’s all way too
familiar, and the complicated story causes Royal
Flash to sprawl over 102 minutes that feel like three hours.
Still, costar
Oliver Reed has a blast playing the German aristocrat who makes Flashman’s life
hell, while Alan Bates savors a rare lighthearted role as a European who may or
may not be Flashman’s ally. The production design is beautiful, with lots of
desolate wintry fields and ornate European castles, and Lester stages action
with his signature mix of slapstick and swordplay, an inimitable style no one
has ever been able to replicate. Plus, in McDowell’s defense, he’s very funny
playing a guttersnipe, and it’s not his fault Lester perversely elected to
build the movie around a detestable characterization.
Royal
Flash: FUNKY
2 comments:
I agree with 100 percent of this review. I love the Flashman books but can't quite come around on this movie - McDowell's casting, plus the bizarre emphasis on slapstick. Watching the film, I always wonder why Alan Bates is playing the villain instead of Flashman himself.
Actually, Richard Lester's American (though most of his work has been done in Britain).
Post a Comment