Possibly Clint Eastwood’s
least interesting Western, this forgettable action flick has an impressive
pedigree: Celebrated novelist Elmore Leonard wrote the screenplay, and
macho-cinema veteran John Sturges (The
Magnificent Seven) directed. The thin story has bounty hunter Joe Kidd
(Eastwood) recruited by a rapacious developer (Robert Duvall) to track down a
Mexican revolutionary (John Saxon) who is impeding the developer’s plans. The
revolutionary also makes the unwise choice of getting on Kidd’s bad side. One
can see glimmers of Leonard’s style in the rangy plotting and in Kidd’s bitchy
comic-relief observations, but while the best Leonard-derived Westerns have
rock-solid conceits (see both versions of 3:10
to Yuma), the storyline of Joe Kidd
is leisurely and unfocused. The movie looks pretty good with DP Bruce Surtees
behind the lens, though it seems he was asked to light sets more brightly than
he usually does, and Eastwood is always a compelling to watch when he’s got a
six-gun on his hip, so Joe Kidd is
more or less watchable. Yet Duvall marks his time in a role so trite and
underwritten it would stifle any actor, and the miscast Saxon snarls lines
through a silly Spanish accent. Saxon also fails to demonstrate the charisma
one might expect from a grassroots leader, so it’s tempting to conjecture that
Leonard envisioned a complex characterization. Some of the shootouts in Joe Kidd are moderately
entertaining, but when such incidental details as the use of unusual firearms
and an appearance by Dick Van Patten as a hotel clerk stick in the memory more
than the main narrative, that’s an indication something unremarkable has
unspooled.
Joe Kidd: LAME

1 comment:
As a lover of westerns, I knew there was a reason I was never drawn to Joe Kidd. No one ever mentions this one much when talking of Eastwoods westerns.
Post a Comment