After the success of Tommy (1975), director Ken Russell’s
flamboyant adaptation of the Who’s first “rock opera” LP, it was inevitable
that someone would tackle the British band’s follow-up opus, Quadrophenia. And while Franc Roddam’s
movie of Quadrophenia is more
grounded and mature than Russell’s silly phantasmagoria, Roddam’s movie is just
as unsatisfying as its predecessor. Set during the clashes that erupted in the
’60s between two factions of British youth culture—old-school “Rockers” in
leather jackets and new-style “Mods” in natty suits—the picture is primarily a
straight-ahead dramatic presentation, but it features a few fanciful scenes
that feel like early music videos, and in one or two key moments, Who songs on
the soundtrack directly correlate to what’s happening within the frame. So it’s
not a musical, but then sometimes it is
a musical—sort of.
As if this indecisive approach wasn’t sufficiently
distracting, the script (credited to three writers, though the real underlying
author is Who tunesmith Pete Townshend) suffers from an overabundance of
symbolic events and a shortage of narrative momentum. As does the LP on which
the picture is based, the movie follows Jimmy Cooper (Phil Daniels), an angry
young Mod who resents his job, his parents, and any other entity that
represents authority. Yet for all his seemingly iconoclastic rebellion, he’s a
joiner in a big way, driving the same scooter and wearing the same garb as all
of his Mod mates. After a series of disillusioning events—most of which are
triggered by Jimmy’s obnoxious behavior—Jimmy becomes alienated from every aspect of society, not just authority
figures.
The last half-hour of the picture starts to finally feel as if it’s
going somewhere, with potent Who numbers including “5:15” and “Love Reign O’er
Me” accompanying shots of a drugged-out Jimmy leaving civilization behind to
experience a vaguely defined epiphany at an oceanside cliff. Had the
picture concluded with more definitive imagery, the whole story might have felt more purposeful. Alas, Quadrophenia comprises little more than
well-photographed narrative meandering. There’s some great stuff here and there,
like re-creations of nightclub excitement and street-fight chaos, and the
acting is generally good; beyond the intense Daniels and the appealing leading
lady Leslie Ash, the picture features a young Ray Winstone, as Jimmy’s
ill-fated Rocker pal, and future rock god Sting, in a small role as a
charismatic Mod. But given the halfhearted blending of the drama and musical
genres, the diffuse quality of the screenplay, and even the hard-to-penetrate working-class
British accents, Quadrophenia is not
an easy movie to love.
Quadrophenia: FUNKY
3 comments:
I have to comment on this one being in music and also a Who fan. You really nailed it in this review when you said the last half hour it starts to go somewhere. We get to reap the benefits of the powerful combination that can happen with images and music during "5:15" and "love reign on me" perhaps with the right director and script this could have been the masterpiece that the audio album was.
I know I'm nine years late and it's a lot longer than that since I saw the movie but I am sure the climax occurs at the Seven Sisters near Eastbourne not at the White Cliffs of Dover.
While Howard Hampton compares "Quadrophenia" to Martin Scorsese’s "Mean Streets" in an essay written for the Criterion DVD release, the film is closest in topic, theme, and format to disco-drenched "Saturday Night Fever" (1977). The Who vocalist Roger Daltrey makes the connection in a 1979 making-of featurette included among the DVD extras. Daltrey, who expresses his admiration of "Saturday Night Fever", felt at the time that its release 2 years before "Quadrophenia" detracted from his film’s impact, given that both were built around a soundtrack and both dealt with a young man reassessing his life against the backdrop of music, fashion, and a particular cultural scene.
Post a Comment