Well regarded for its
sympathetic portrayal of a young blind man whose travails echo those of all
persons living with disabilities, Butterflies
Are Free has some fine ideas and sentiments, but it’s also long-winded,
stilted, and trite. Adapted by Leonard Gershe from his successful play of the
same name, the picture explores challenges faced by Don Baker (Edward Albert),
a college-aged suburban youth trying to live on his own for the first time. For
the first half of the story, he’s excited by the affections of a sexy neighbor,
cheerfully irresponsible hippie Jill Tanner (Goldie Hawn), and for the second
half the story, Don is tormented by the smothering attentions of his
overprotective mother, referred to only as Mrs. Baker (Eileen Heckart).
According to the introduction accompanying a recent broadcast of Butterflies Are Free on Turner Classic
Movies, the significance of the picture is that it captured the tone of the
early-’70s “independent living” movement, during which persons with
disabilities attempted to break from the traditional cycle of home care and
institutionalization. And, indeed, Gershe’s narrative crisply depicts myriad
hardships people like Don must have faced on a daily basis in less-informed
times, from condescending attitudes to the genuine fear of overwhelming
situations. Alas, Gershe’s weapon of choice is overly literate dialogue, so the
characters in the story feel more like polemic representations than actual
people: Mrs. Baker represents oppression, Jill represents freedom, and Don
wants to exist somewhere between those extremes.
If the filmmaking had more
vitality and the acting was transcendent, the mannered nuances of Gershe’s
writing would be more tolerable. Unfortunately, director Milton Katselas does
little more than film a theatrical production; Butterflies Are Free is so flat one can almost feel the curtain
descending whenever the story lurches from one act to the next. Yet leading man
Albert is the movie’s biggest weakness. Bland and unmemorable,
he delivers a performance more suited to an afterschool special than a
theatrical feature. Hawn fares better, simply because of her beauty and charm; if
nothing else, the fact that she spends a third of the movie in her underwear
commands a certain kind of attention. Heckart, who won a Supporting Actress
Oscar for the movie, benefits from Gershe’s best-written role. Anguished and
sarcastic, Heckhart’s character charts a believable arc from assumption to
understanding. Heckart’s isn’t a performance for the ages, per se, but her
solid work elevates an otherwise mediocre endeavor.
Butterflies Are Free: FUNKY
1 comment:
I agree, Heckart is the best thing about the movie, but I do enjoy both Goldie and Edward Albert, too. He really was rather dreamy! Hawn is perfectly cast and a bubbly delight.
Post a Comment