Slow,
somber, and subtle, Stanley Kubrick’s three-hour historical drama Barry
Lyndon, adapted from an 1844 novel by William Makepeace Thackeray, isn’t
just one of the most unusual films of the 1970s—it is, in many ways, one of the
most unusual films ever released by a major Hollywood studio. Arty and
meditative from its first frame to its last, the picture is more of a cerebral
exercise than an entertainment experience—envision a serious of gorgeous
paintings accompanied by mesmerizing classical music and a wry narration track
that contextualizes onscreen events, and you’ll come close to imagining what
it’s like to watch Barry Lyndon. Even the film’s principal actors, Ryan
O’Neal and Marisa Berenson, are featured as objects, their beautiful faces and
figures used as blank slates onto which Kubrick projects his (and Thackeray’s)
timeless themes of gamesmanship and greed. By reducing the importance of his
actors to visual impact, Kubrick amplifies that Barry Lyndon is auteur
filmmaking in the purest sense—even though the writer/director/producer didn’t
generate the underlying material, he orchestrates every miniscule detail. (There’s
a reason the movie took a reported 300 days to shoot, an eternity compared to
normal production schedules.)
Set throughout Europe in the middle-to-late
1700s, the story follows Irishman Redmond Barry (O’Neal) as he seeks his
fortune. The synchronicity between Kubrick’s dry humor and Thackeray’s
narrative becomes evident during an early scene featuring a highwayman. The
robber stops Barry on a remote path in a forest, then steals Barry’s horse and
money, but the whole exchange is conducted with the high language and perfect
manners of gentlemen. Courtly criminality—could there be a better metaphor with
which to communicate Kubrick’s cynical worldview? After being stripped of his
humble resources, Barry transitions to a series of military adventures, but he
eventually flees the military and bewitches a fabulously wealthy Countess, Lady
Lyndon (Berenson). The minor obstacle of her husband is quickly dispatched when
Barry’s brazen play for Lady Lyndon’s affections causes the husband to die of a
coronary. Barry installs himself as the man’s replacement, but Barry’s social climb commences a
new series of travails.
Even though the film sprawls across three hours and
moves at a stately pace, Barry Lyndon is hypnotic. Working with the
genius cameraman John Alcott, Kubrick designs one beguiling visual after
another, using deft tricks to create verisimilitude suggestive of the story’s
era—most of the shots are static (and when they’re not, the camera moves are
generally gradual and understated). Further, in the film’s most talked-about
flourish, Kubrick and Alcott employ specially designed lenses to shoot nighttime interior scenes with only candlelight for illumination. Every
sensation that meets the eye in Barry Lyndon casts a spell, from the
spectacular Old Europe locations to the ornate costumes and hairstyles; better
still, Kubrick merges images, music, and narration with symphonic precision.
Whether the movie actually packs an emotional punch is a subjective matter—as
is the larger question of whether such a story needs to pack an
emotional punch—but the consummate artistry of
the endeavor is undeniable. Whatever its shortcomings, not the least of which is O’Neal’s
beautifully vacuous presence in the title role, Barry Lyndon captures
moods and sensations virtually no other film has before or since.
Barry
Lyndon:
RIGHT ON
7 comments:
Now we're talking!! "Every sensation that meets the eye in Barry Lyndon casts a spell" You said it. My 2nd favorite Kubrick next to Eyes Wide Shut and a simply amazing film. And as far as Ryan O Neal, I've said it before and I'll say it again- He can't act his way out of a paper bag, but in the 70's there was no one who even comes close to his on-screen charisma.
Based on your recommendations and interesting insight I'll have to give this film another try. I saw this over 20 years ago and felt it was just too slooooooooooow and could never quite get into it and like Tommy said above Ryan O'Neal can't act his way out of a paperbag and was even badly upstaged by his own daughter in 'Paper Moon'.
I had the same experience -- fell asleep watching it 20 years ago. Revisiting it from a more mature perspective, I saw the film quite differently. Cold, yes, but beautiful and meaningful.
Loved BARRY LYNDON and certainly did not expect to. Captivating. Definitely a fave Kubrick (nice to see love for EYES WIDE SHUT).
If you have only seen this, as I first did, on a VHS tape on a cheap TV, you really owe it to yourself to watch it again on your big HD TV. It is just stunningly beautiful.
Kubrick borrowed cameras from NASA in order to shoot by candlelight.
But, man is Ryan O'Neil a brick of an actor.
How opinions vary. I find this film to be Kubrick's masterpiece, "Eyes Wide Shut" his weakest film (though admirable in places), and O'Neal a fine actor of that era ("What's Up' Doc," Paper Moon," "Lyndon")
One of Kubrick's best, for the cinematography alone. Not on par with "2001", or "A Clockwork Orange", but very good indeed.
Post a Comment