Lots
of ink has been spilled analyzing the latter-day career of director Eliza
Kazan, a onetime champion of the left-wing theatrical community and a key
figure in the process of introducing Method acting to America. Around the same
time he made cinematic masterpieces with Marlon Brando (A Streetcar Named Desire), James Dean (East of Eden), and Andy Griffith (A Face in the Crowd), Kazan turned on old friends by “naming names”
before the U.S. government’s anti-communist witch hunters. Partially owing to
the complex political dynamics of his career, Kazan was effectively finished as
a director of major studio films just a few years later, circa the early ’60s.
Nonetheless, he still had some creative gas left in the tank, as evidenced by
the offbeat low-budget project The
Visitors, Kazan’s penultimate feature.
Stamped with his signatures of emotional
intensity and truthful acting, the picture feels hipper and rougher and more
contemporary than anything one might reasonably expect from a 63-year-old
(Kazan’s age at the time of the movie’s release). A small, character-driven
drama/thriller written by one of Kazan’s sons, Chris Kazan, The Visitors is a nihilistic story about
psychologically scarred Vietnam veterans, and the whole film is set on a remote
farm in the Northeast during wintertime.
Unassuming vet Bill Schmidt (James
Woods) lives with his girlfriend, Martha (Patricia Joyce), on a farmed owned by
her father, Harry Wayne (Patrick McVey). Harry, who resides in a guesthouse
adjoining the farm’s main residence, is an alcoholic he-man novelist, so
underlying tension stems from his disapproval of Bill’s pacifistic
timidity. One day, two of Bill’s
Army comrades show up unexpectedly. Mike Nickerson (Steve Railsback) feigns
courtesy but obviously hides tremendous rage, while Tony Rodrigues (Chico
Martinez) tags along and follows Mike’s orders without question. As the
day-long visit progresses, the vets bond with Harry—who respects their blood
lust and racist attitudes—while Bill prepares for inevitable violence. It turns
out that during the war, Mike and Tony committed atrocities, and Bill was the
soldier who testified against them. (Make what you will about the parallels
between this backstory and Kazan’s personal history.)
Shot in grainy
16-millimeter, The Visitors has the
feel of a scrappy independent film even though Kazan’s handling of pacing and
tone is masterful. The picture has the slow-burn structure of a horror film,
and it’s stomach-churning to watch a metaphorical cloud of darkness form over
the tiny farm. Moreover, the screenplay illuminates the line dividing the
“sanctioned” violence germane to American life (the brutal football game
several characters watch, Harry’s tales of killing enemies in World War II,
etc.) from the “unsanctioned” violence of actual criminals. Does one beget the
other?
The Visitors has flaws, of
course, notably a nasty sort of sexual politics. Further, the film is
unremittingly grim, which will make it a tough experience for many viewers. But
especially thanks to incendiary performances by Railsback (one of the screen’s
great portrayers of psychosis), Woods (a live wire even in a restrained role
such as this one), and McVey (who channels Sterling Hayden with a vengeance), The Visitors is gripping from start to
finish.
The Visitors: GROOVY
4 comments:
Nice one Peter, gonna have to check this out. I am a big fan of Mr Kazan and would like to add that he was also a tremendous writer. If you can ever find his old novel called The Understudy, it's one heck of a great tale about an old washed up actor.
I'm really glad you liked this one. An underrated obscurity for sure waiting to be rediscovered. Actor Railsback has also been underappreciated and worse underused, but as you already mentioned quite effective here.
I don't think this is a "great" film. I'm not even sure if it's a "good" picture. But every time I see that it's on I have to watch.
Wow, I guess I'm a lot closer to Maltin's "BOMB" on this one! ... I had to watch the last 15 minutes a second time in order to really process an ending THAT ineffectual & THAT counter-productive, was really what I had witnessed! ... Frankly, I don't think the problem here is "nihilism" or "nasty sexual politics" -- certainly not on the part of Kazan pere at least ... And I get that the fact that a psychopath is gonna do what he's gonna do (again!), & not deign to give us a Hollywood ending ... We all knew that already all too well, if we've seen the likes of "Henry, Portrait of a Serial Killer" & so on ... It's an imbecilic "straw man" (or should I say "straw dogs"!) argument, to try to impute blame on the victim, for showing some responsiveness , or fascinatiion with the primal male animus, or wearing short skirts, or blah blah blah ... I doubt even in the seventies that anyone actually believed any of that crap for one second -- it was just yet another way of letting the bad man off the hook -- so that we can collectively pretend that everything is just random in this best of all possible worlds ...
Post a Comment