After establishing himself
as a formidable director of television commercials, Ridley Scott made the leap
to feature filmmaking with this handsome adaptation of a Joseph Conrad short
story titled “The Duel,” which was based on real people who existed in
Napoleonic France. A small-scale drama exploring huge themes of honor, military
conduct, nationalism, and personal obsession, the movie boasts gorgeous
costuming and production design, impressively evoking early 19th-century Europe
even though the film was made for less than $1 million. (In fact, budget
constraints probably added to the verisimilitude, because Scott shot the movie
on existing locations instead of sets.) From start to finish, The Duellists offers a feast of artful
images, with Scott emulating the lighting style of 19th-century paintings and
treating every shot as an opportunity to demonstrate his gifts for pictorial
composition. Clearly, Scott’s visual acumen impressed many, since the picture
won the Best Debut Film at the 1977 Cannes Film Festival and helped Scott
secure his career-making job as the director of Alien (1979). Alas, for all its elegance, The Duellists is a hopelessly cold film. The motivations of the
characters are dramatized well enough, but human feeling is smothered by
meticulous imagery—at this point in his career, Scott seemingly lacked the
skills needed to extract passion from his players.
In his defense, the movie was
badly miscast. Originally set to star Oliver Reed and Michael York, the picture
instead features Keith Carradine and Harvey Keitel. Both actors are so
inherently modern (and so inherently American) that they seem like they’re
playing dress-up. Another problem is that the story is an intellectual exercise
rather than a proper drama. When the movie begins, savage French officer Feraud
(Keitel) skewers an aristocratic opponent in a duel. Another officer, d’Hubert
(Carradine), is sent to arrest Feraud, but Feraud—who is obsessed with
dueling—invents a slight as pretense for drawing d’Hubert into a fight. And so
begins decades of on-again/off-again combat between the men, with their battles
ending in draws until a peculiar resolution puts an end to their lifelong
quarrel. Scott captures the surfaces of this strange story, but never the inner
lives of the characters, so the question underlying the narrative—asking why
one man seeks to foment conflict while the other seeks to resolve it—receives
only perfunctory attention. As a result, The
Duellists is quite dull and repetitive, which is a shame, since it’s easy
to imagine a full-blooded version of the same material casting a powerful
spell. Nonetheless, The Duellists is
interesting to watch as the opening act of a great directorial career, and it
holds many delights for fans of pictorial splendor.
The Duellists: FUNKY
3 comments:
I've tried to watch this several times but really couldn't get past Keitel and Carradine. Had no idea they were second choices. That original cast is superb...
Is the past a prologue? The applicability of your observations about miscasting and meticulous visual detail smothering the complex inner life of a character may again come to pass in Scott's single greatest attempt to transcend Kubrick or Lean and create the ultimate magnum opus of his long and prolific career, essentially coming full circle from his very beginnings to late in his life, namely "Napoleon", starring Joaquin Phoenix.
Oh, one other thing. Will "Napoleon" resonate as a political allegory for the Donald Trump era as "The Duellists" wished to resonate as a political allegory for the Nixon/Vietnam era?
Post a Comment