An enervated south-of-the-border Western in the
vein of The Magnificent Seven (1960)
and The Professionals (1966)—but
lacking the sophisticated execution of those great films—The Proud and Damned stars leather-faced tough guy Chuck Connors as
the leader of a roving gang comprising ex-Confederate soldiers. Looking for a
new start after the end of the Civil War, the gunslingers wander into Colombia,
where they get jobs as hired muscle for a dictator. Sent to intimidate the
impoverished citizens of a region that’s fomenting rebellion against the
dictator, the American mercenaries predictably switch allegiances to the
oppressed locals. Meanwhile, one of the Americans falls in love with a pretty
senorita despite a language barrier. Excepting perhaps a major tragedy that
occurs two-thirds of the way through the picture, not a single thing in The Proud and Damned has the power to
surprise. The actions, character, dialogue, and situations are all so painfully
familiar that it’s a struggle to stay awake while watching the picture,
especially since the performances are as listless as the material. (It says
everything you need to know that the only marquee-name actor in the picture
besides Connors is Cesar Romero, best known for playing the Joker on the ’60s Batman series.) Writer-producer-director
Ferde Grofé Jr. strings together clichés with a stunning lack of imagination,
and he films everything in the flat style of a bad ’70s TV show. Furthermore,
he evinces zero ability to generate legitimate dramatic tension. As such,
actors are stuck in boring compositions, batting vanilla dialogue back and
forth without any semblance of genuine human conflict. In other words, even
though it might be unfair to describe The
Proud and Damned as awful, since everything that happens more or less makes
sense, it’s absolutely fair to describe The
Proud and the Damned as vapid. Literally nothing in this movie hasn’t been
done better elsewhere.
The
Proud and Damned: LAME
No comments:
Post a Comment