Insanity is the watchword when discussing the
British satirical film The Ruling Class,
adapted for the screen by Peter Barnes from his play of the same name and
starring the incomparable Peter O’Toole. (Completing the purely coincidental
Peter troika, the film was directed by Peter Medak.) Not only is insanity the
subject of The Ruling Class, insanity
is the best possible explanation for the existence
of the picture. Surely, no reasonable person could have imagined success would
flow from a project brimming with rude jabs at the moneyed caste of
English society, quasi-sacrilegious jokes at the expense of Christianity, and
surreal song-and-dance interludes. To describe this as risky material is to
make a gross understatement, since The
Ruling Class has something to offend—or at least completely bewilder—nearly
everyone.
Set largely on a British estate, the story begins when the 13th Earl
of Gurney, Ralph Gurney (Harry Andrews), commits suicide in spectacular
fashion. A ballerina’s tutu, a military uniform, and autoerotic self-asphyxiation
are involved. After Ralph’s death, control of the Gurney estate falls to Jack Gurney
(O’Toole), who has spent much of his life in psychiatric institutions. A
flamboyant narcissist who thinks he’s God and tends to express himself through
musical performance, Jack is so unambiguously crazy that he makes seemingly
easy prey for Sir Charles (William Mervyn), a relative scheming to declare Jack
unstable and thereby seize control of the family empire. Unfortunately for Sir
Charles, Jack proves more formidable than expected.
Furthermore, Sir Charles’
machinations are complicated by the strict requirements of English upper-class
decorum, and that’s where the strongest elements of Barnes’ satire emerge.
While far from subtle, Barnes’ strategy is to skewer a strata of people so
entitled they consider deviation from social norms an inalienable right. In
other words, nothing a nobleman or noblewoman does is wrong by dint of the fact
that “the ruling class” has limitless largesse.
Using this narrative framework
as a license to play, Barnes (and, by extension, Medak) lets loose with myriad
strange scenes. For instance, Jack spends part of the movie in full
Jesus drag, delivering imperious dialogue from the cross on which he mimics
crucifixion. Yet Barnes doesn’t allow The
Ruling Class to float completely into the ether of anything-goes chaos,
because he grounds the story—somewhat—with easily recognizable conflicts
including Sir Charles’ battle for supremacy and Jack’s theological debates with
Bishop Lampton (Alistair Sim), an elderly clergyman who finds Jack’s antics
maddening.
Judged by conventional criteria, The
Ruling Class is an overindulgent freakshow, sprawling across two and a half
hours. Taken on its own terms, however, the movie is strangely beguiling,
especially because O’Toole attacks the main role with such vigor. In fact, one
could easily complain that O’Tool demonstrates too much vigor, since his flouncing and screaming and speechifying
gets a bit overwhelming after a while. But then again, those with a low
threshold for grandstanding should give The
Ruling Class a wide berth, anyway—this one’s all about the more-is-more
aesthetic. Everyone involved in The
Ruling Class seems to revel in the irony of filling a grand house suited
for restrained comportment with deranged excess.
The
Ruling Class: FREAKY
2 comments:
I remember seeing this at a friend's recommendation, and when she asked how I liked it I said "It could have used a bit of cream and sugar." My father summed it up something like "The world accepts you as a madman more easily when you're bad rather than good." I appreciated Coral Browne's strip tease. However, my favorite comedy of noble inheritance continues to be "kind Hearts and Coronets" with Alec Guinness in enough roles to make even Peter Sellers' head spin.
Maybe could have used a dose of Monty Python "And now for something completely different" (1971). Unfortunately, MP did not have a Peter to add to the troika!
Post a Comment