It’s good-news/bad-news time. The good news it that, unlikely as it might have seemed when this project launched seven years ago, I’m close to my goal of reviewing every movie from the 1970s that I can track down (and that meets my criteria favoring American-made theatrical features). For those who dig numbers, I’ve identified approximately 2,700 titles that fit the criteria, of which more than 2,300 have been reviewed thus far. Best guess at this particular moment is that about 300 movies will escape my grasp, as a fair number of minor titles have disappeared from mainstream distribution. So, give or take any discoveries I might make in the intervening period, about 100 to 150 more movies will be reviewed, in addition to those already written up and awaiting publication. My guestimate of when the blog will cease regular publication is March of next year, though depending on what happens after that—I’m presently exploring the possibility of republication in book form—some erratic dribs and drabs might follow the cessation of daily posting. And that, of course, is the bad news—the end of this mad project is near. To that point, I’ll make one last entreaty for donations, because acquiring the final batch of movies will involve some expenditures, and I’d love to paint as complete a picture as possible of the cinema of the ’70s before closing up shop. Every little bit helps, no matter how modest the contribution. Anyway, that’s all for now except to say, as always, keep on keepin’ on!
Monday, October 16, 2017
Permission to Kill (1975)
“You’re a very
clever man,” the revolutionary says to the spy. “What a waste you’re an evil
one.” That sharp dialogue indicates the provocative themes pulsing through Permission to Kill, a European/US
coproduction released in America with the graceless title The Executioner. Elegant, meditative, and restrained, this picture
won’t be for everyone’s taste, since it’s not purely the action/suspense piece
one might expect. Yet neither is it purely cerebral in the vein of, say, some
Graham Greene adaptation. Permission to
Kill occupies an interesting middle ground, spicing its intricate plotting
and thoughtful characterization with a dash of luridness. Defining the film’s
icy tone are Dirk Bogarde’s soft-spoken performance in the leading role of a
ruthless manipulator, and cinematographer Freddie Young’s classically beautiful
compositions. Whereas many espionage thrillers of the ’70s opted for
grittiness, Permission to Kill
luxuriates in European elegance.
Although the central premise is simple, the
pathway the storytellers take toward presenting the premise is slightly obtuse,
presumably by design—in the spy world, nothing is ever simple. Alan Curtis
(Bogarde) works for a mysterious agency that wishes to prevent leftist
Alexander Diakim (Bekim Fehmiu) from returning to his home country, where it is
assumed he will foment a communist revolt against the totalitarian
powers-that-be. Thus Alan recruits four civilians and one professional. Each of
the four civilians has some connection to Alexander, either financial or
personal, so Alan blackmails them into pressuring Alexander, who is presently
exiled in Austria. The professional is a beautiful French assassin, Melissa
(Nicole Calfan), hired as an insurance policy should the others fail to impede
Alexander’s disruptive homecoming. Much of the film explores Alan’s fraught
encounters with the people he’s using, all of whom regard him as a soulless
monster. For instance, Katina (Ava Gardner), Alexander’s former lover, is
appalled when Alan reveals his willingness to involve the child she had with
Alexander, long since given up for adoption. Eventually, Alan’s cruelty
inspires two of the pawns, British government functionary Charles (Timothy
Dalton) and American journalist Scott (Frederic Forrest), to engineer a
counter-conspiracy against their tormentor.
While Permission to Kill has a ticking-clock aspect, it’s as much a
character piece as a potboiler. Even Vanessa, about whom little is revealed
beyond her lovely figure, comes across as complicated and dimensional. Writer
Robin Estridge, who adapted the script from his own novel, revels in the
duplicity and gamesmanship of spycraft, so when Alan coolly says, “The truth is
what I make it,” the remark doesn’t seem like empty posturing. None of this is
to suggest that Permission to Kill is
flawless, since the performances are uneven (Forrest delivers clumsy work and
Gardner’s breathy melodrama feels old-fashioned), and since some viewers may
rightly grow impatient between bursts of action. For those who lock into its
downbeat groove, however, Permission to
Kill is smart and vicious, a palliative for the cartoonish superficiality
of Bond flicks and their escapist ilk.
Permission to Kill: GROOVY
Sunday, October 15, 2017
1980 Week: The Black Marble
After a great run in the
’70s, during which his books and scripts were adapted into several movies and a
pair of TV series, cop-turned-writer Joseph Wambaugh took a stab at romantic
comedy with The Black Marble.
Directed by Harold Becker, who helmed the Wambaugh-derived The Onion Field (1979), this picture applies the writer’s familiar
absurdist prism to a depiction of cops and criminals. Specifically, the movie
tracks an alcoholic detective’s inept efforts to rescue a kidnapped dog. Shot
at various offbeat locations in Los Angeles, the movie has a fantastic
widescreen look and a host of unusual characters, to say nothing of skillful
comedic performances by stars Robert Foxworth, Paula Prentiss, and Harry Dean
Stanton. However, the individual whose contributions prevent the movie from
realizing its ambitious goals is Wambaugh. For all his quirky details and
surprising twists, he can’t quite get a handle on the picture’s tone, and he
frequently depicts people behaving in ways that are opposite to their
established characterizations. The Black
Marble is humane and strange, but it’s frustrating because it’s so badly in
need of a heavy rewrite.
Foxworth stars as Sgt. Alex Valnikov, a perpetually
besotted veteran cop traumatized by a series of child murders he once
investigated. Kicked off the LAPD’s homicide division and reassigned to the
robbery squad in the Hollywood precinct, Valnikov gets partnered with
high-strung Sgt. Natalie Zimmerman (Prentiss), who resents being made caretaker
for a has-been. They’re assigned to help Madeline Whitfield (Barbara Babcock)
recover her dog after a mystery man demands a huge ransom for the dog’s return.
In separate scenes, the filmmakers explore the kidnapper’s pathetic life. He’s
Philo Skinner (Stanton), a sleazy dog groomer overwhelmed by gambling debts. As
the story progresses, Natalie discovers Valnikov’s endearing traits, even as
Philo’s actions become more and more desperate. Giving away more would do a
disservice to the picture.
Foxworth, usually cast as a hunk, relishes his
opportunity to play a fully textured character, and he has some moderately
effective moments as well as a few comic highlights. Yet the script does not
serve him well, especially when Valnikov suddenly transforms from a suicidal
alcoholic to a wounded romantic. Similarly, Prentisss’ sharp comic timing helps
mask bumpy shifts in her characterization. Stanton fares best, and the scene of
him threatening to slice off the kidnapped dog’s ear is simultaneously
grotesque and poignant.
The Black Marble: FUNKY
Saturday, October 14, 2017
1980 Week: The Man With Bogart’s Face
Nostalgia for the golden
era of film noir infused a number of movies in the ’70s and
’80s, from Roman Polanski’s provocative Chinatown
(1974) to Carl Reiner’s silly Dead Men
Don’t Wear Plaid (1982) and beyond. Yet perhaps the strangest tip of the
cinematic fedora was The Man With
Bogart’s Face, a lighthearted mystery flick starring Humphrey Bogart
lookalike Robert Saachi. Ostensibly a comedy, the picture has an innately surreal
quality not only because of Saachi’s eerie resemblance but also because of the bizarre way
that writer/producer Andrew J. Fenaday addresses the resemblance within the
storyline. The flick begins with Sam Marlowe (Saachi) in a doctor’s office,
having bandages removed from his head. The idea is that Sam,
or whatever his real name might be, is so nuts for Bogie that he had his
features surgically altered. Sam also starts a private-eye business, drives
around in a car from the 1940s, and wears a trenchcoat reminiscent of Bogart’s costume from the
final scene of Casablanca (1942). People often ask what’s wrong with
his face whenever Sam mimics Bogart’s signature tic of flexing his lips. And so on. But because Fenaday never provides any backstory for the leading character, The Man With Bogart’s Face dodges the big question of whether the title character
is a raving lunatic.
Vexing mysteries about the leading character
aren’t the only issues plaguing this film, which is overlong but otherwise pleasant
to watch thanks to an eventful storyline and the presence of familiar supporting
actors. The biggest problem is the limp nature of the picture’s
comedy. Sight gags and verbal jokes fall flat on a regular basis. That said, it’s possible to consume The Man With Bogart’s Face as a goofy mystery and overlook the weak attempts at hilarity. As one might expect from a genre homage, the plot is formulaic—several clients hire Sam for cases that turn out to
be interconnected, and everyone’s after a priceless treasure. Sam’s pithy
voiceover connects scenes of betrayal, seduction, suspense, and violence, all
of which are played for lukewarm laughs. Providing the movie’s eye-candy
quotient are Sybil Danning, Olivia Hussey, Michelle Phillips, and Misty Rowe.
Lending various shades of villainy are Victor Buono, Herbert Lom, Franco Nero,
George Raft, and Jay Robinson. As for Saachi, his mimicry is smooth enough to
complete the weird illusion created by his dopplegänger appearance.
The Man With Bogart’s Face: FUNKY
Friday, October 13, 2017
1980 Week: Defiance
The sad decline of
Jan-Michael Vincent’s career was well underway when he made this humane but
unremarkable urban-violence picture. Vincent does passable work as a dude who
stumbles into a war between ghetto dwellers and the savage street gang terrorizing
them, and Defiance boasts slick
direction by John Flynn as well as appealing supporting turns by Danny Aiello,
Art Carney, and Theresa Saldana. Yet the story is predictable, and the action
quotient isn’t high enough to satisfy the target audience. Furthermore, because
Vincent reportedly spent a fair amount of the production inebriated, Defiance captures the moment just before
too many ho-hum movies and too much booze depleted his movie-star capital. A
few years after making this picture, Vincent took a job playing second banana
to a helicopter on the TV show Airwolf,
and things got much, much worse from there.
In any event, Vincent plays Tommy,
a seaman who temporarily loses his work license, forcing him to linger in New
York City. He takes a tenement apartment and befriends neighbors including Abe
(Carney), Carmine (Aiello), and Marsha (Saldana). These folks live in fear of
the Souls, a violent gang led by Angel (Rudy Ramos). The Souls prey upon
Tommy’s friends, but he says it’s not his problem until the villains cross a
line, triggering Tommy’s violent intervention.
Rare is the movie that deserves
criticism for offering too much character development, but the first hour of Defiance meanders through one pleasant
getting-t0-know-you scene after another, so it takes forever to get to the
action. Had the picture gone deeper, for instance rendering Angel as a
multidimensional character, this intimate approach might have worked. Alas, Defiance exists somewhere between the superficiality
of a good B-movie and the substance of a proper dramatic film. Nonetheless,
it’s a skillfully made project that benefits from extensive location
photography, and Vincent conveys winning vulnerability as well as formidable
physicality. He’s more of a presence than a performer here, but he wasn’t so
far gone that his gifts had completely left him.
Defiance:
FUNKY
Thursday, October 12, 2017
1980 Week: Without Warning
Schlockmeister Greydon
Clark strikes again with this dull alien-invasion picture, which was made so
cheaply that only one alien is featured. The picture mostly comprises interminable scenes of teenagers running from danger, so Without Warning is more akin to the
slasher movies of the late ’70s and early ’80s than to other space-monster
movies of the same period. It’s worth nothing that cinematographer Dean Cundey
also shot Halloween (1978), because
Clark apes that picture’s style quite shamelessly with heavy shadows and long
Steadicam shots. In the opening sequence, a hunter and his son get killed by
flying discs that look like fried eggs with tentacles growing out of them, so
viewers learn quickly not to expect much. Later, two young couples hop into a
van and head for the woods, encountering the requisite creepy old people on the
way there. Word to the wise: When the proprietor of a general store
filled with taxidermy says don’t go in the woods, maybe don’t go in the woods.
Anyway, the flying egg things kill two of the teenagers, forcing survivors
Greg (Christopher T. Nelson) and Sandy (Tarah Nutter) to seek help from the
aforementioned creepy old people. The gas-station guy (Jack Palance) offers
assistance, but a crazed ex-soldier (Martin Landau) makes things worse by slipping
into a Vietnam flashback. Landau and Palance enliven their scenes, but the most
enjoyable bits of Without Warning are
unintentionally funny, as when Greg and Sandy defeat a horrific outer-space
monster that’s attacking their car—by knocking
it off the car with their windshield wipers. Consider yourselves warned
about Without Warning.
Without Warning: LAME
Wednesday, October 11, 2017
1980 Week: A Small Circle of Friends
While it’s in some ways a well-intentioned film
about the worthy subject of how participating in civil disobedience as college
students during the late ’60s impacted the students’ later lives, A Small Circle of Friends is a textbook
example of Hollywood bludgeoning complex ideas into simplistic scenarios. A Small Circle of Friends mostly
concerns a contrived romantic triangle. Nick Baxter (Jameson Parker) is a
conservative golden boy pursuing a medical degree, Leonardo DaVinci Rizzo (Brad
Davis) is a trouble-making lefty student journalist, and Jessica Bloom (Karen
Allen) is the sensitive artist caught between them.
Ezra Sacks’ story is
sufficiently eventful and specific to avoid seeming completely trite, but his
basic premise is so obvious—a clash between activism and conformity—that the
movie becomes laughably schematic. Here’s a scene about drugs! Here’s a campus
riot! Here’s a triumphant moment of sticking it to the uptight college power structure!
Oh, and because you knew this was coming, here’s the tastefully understated
ménage-a-trios scene! Sacks’ screenplay seems more like a to-do list than a
proper narrative. Most of the picture unfolds on the rarified grounds of
Harvard and Radcliffe. Nick sympathizes with the antiwar movement, but mostly
remains focused on his studies. Leonardo is a wild child determined to change
the world one article at a time. He’s also a brazen prankster, so during his
introductory scene, he feigns blindness as a way of cutting in line while
registering for classes. The idea is that Nick becomes fascinated by Leonardo’s
zest for life, while Leonardo secretly respects Nick’s diligence. As for Jessica,
she dates Leonardo first, then switches to Nick, and complications ensue.
Just
as Sacks’ script tends toward superficiality, Rob Cohen’s direction is
impatient, as if he’s afraid of lingering on human emotion. Not helping to
alleviate this problem are the leading men. Davis has a spacey quality, so he
seems crazed rather than eccentric, and Parker is hopelessly bland. Allen is uminous,
though she’s asked to spend far too much time gazing in wonder at her costars.
(Actors playing smaller roles include Shelley Long and Daniel Stern.) Perhaps
the weirdest aspect of the picture is the score, composed by rock songwriter
Jim Steinman, best known for writing Meat Loaf’s hits. To date, this is the
only movie he’s scored, and his music is hilariously overwrought. Some of the
melodies are familiar, as well, because tunes he wrote for this movie later
became Air Supply’s “Making Love Out of Nothing At All” and Bonnie Tyler’s
“Total Eclipse of the Heart.”
A
Small Circle of Friends: FUNKY
Tuesday, October 10, 2017
1980 Week: Phobia
Often cited as the worst
movie John Huston ever made, Phobia
isn’t one of those failed pictures that viewers can enjoy ironically, marveling
at logic bumps and technical errors. Instead, it’s excruciatingly boring. The concept
for this would-be shocker is simple. When his patients start dying in horrible
ways that are related to their phobias, police identify Dr. Peter Ross (Paul
Michael Glaser) as a suspect, then discover he’s involved with a daring
experiment in immersion therapy. Using images and sounds projected on
theater-style equipment, as well as props and real-life situations, Dr. Ross
forces patients to face their fears. As in, he makes a woman who’s afraid of
being molested watch gang-rape scenes, he makes a dude who’s fearful of snakes
handle a giant snake, and so on. Phobia
is so lazy and stupid in its conception that it’s as if the filmmakers either
forgot or simply neglected to create any mystery or suspense, because the truth
of what’s happening is evident from the very first scenes. Every creative
decision compounds the problem. Huston’s camerawork, often a hallmark of his
skillful approach, fails the project completely, because he clearly elected to
shoot the minimum amount of coverage for every scene, the better to wrap
production days early and move on to more interesting activities. The picture
cuts together, but there’s no life in the editing, suggesting there weren’t any
options for generating vitality. And speaking of vitality, that’s exactly what
Glaser, best known as the costar of TV’s Starsky
& Hutch, lacks here. He’s so lethargic it seems like Huston never
bothered to tell Glaser when the camera started running.
Phobia:
LAME
Monday, October 9, 2017
1980 Week: Seems Like Old Times
Rendered by a comedy dream team, Seems Like Old
Times is an old-fashioned farce unburdened by narrative ambition or social
significance. It’s a silly laugh machine with a serviceable love story at the
center, showcasing the fizzy chemistry between Chevy Chase and Goldie Hawn, who
previously scored with Foul Play
(1978). Seems Like Old Times is also one
of the most consistently amusing movies written by Neil Simon, which is saying
something. Until it sputters during in its final scenes (an almost inevitable
outcome given the spinning-plates storyline), Seems Like Old Times is a sugar rush of a movie.
At the beginning of
the story, underemployed Northern California writer Nick Gardenia (Chevy Chase)
becomes a pawn in a bank robbery. (Proving spectacularly inept at criminality,
Nick stares right into the lens of a security camera.) Following
the heist, Nick determines that he must bring the robbers
to justice in order to clear his name. Enter L.A. district attorney Ira Parks
(Charles Grodin), who is married to Nick’s ex-wife, Glenda (Goldie Hawn). His
eyes on the job of state attorney general, Ira resolves to make Nick’s
potentially embarrassing situation go away as quietly as possible. Which means,
naturally, that Nick turns up at Ira’s house, seeking Glenda’s help. She’s an
easy touch, since she works as a public defender and believes that all of her
clients genuinely wish to rehabilitate themselves. You can see where this is
headed: Glenda helps Nick without telling Ira, Nick exploits the situation to
woo Glenda, and chaos explodes thanks to endless
farcical misunderstandings.
Beyond his usual gift for rat-a-tat jokes, Simon brings tremendous craftsmanship to plot construction, developing long-lead setups and wry running jokes as well as rendering droll supporting characters. (T.K. Carter is a riot as Glenda’s butler, a dubiously reformed ex-hoodlum.) As for the Chase/Hawn scenes, they never disappoint. He’s a charming rascal, she’s a ditzy altruist, and the sexual charge between them sizzles. Grodin, as always, stoops to conquer, beautifully underplaying the role of an exasperate schmuck. Meanwhile, director Jay Sandrich, one of the most celebrated sitcom helmers in history—his credits stretch from Make Room For Daddy in 1963 to Two and a Half Men 40 years later—does a remarkable job orchestrating this intricate brew of action and patter and tomfoolery, so it’s a wonder this was the only theatrical feature he ever made. Also bewildering is the fact that Chase and Hawn never reteamed, because Seems Like Old Times did about the same brisk business that Foul Play did.
Beyond his usual gift for rat-a-tat jokes, Simon brings tremendous craftsmanship to plot construction, developing long-lead setups and wry running jokes as well as rendering droll supporting characters. (T.K. Carter is a riot as Glenda’s butler, a dubiously reformed ex-hoodlum.) As for the Chase/Hawn scenes, they never disappoint. He’s a charming rascal, she’s a ditzy altruist, and the sexual charge between them sizzles. Grodin, as always, stoops to conquer, beautifully underplaying the role of an exasperate schmuck. Meanwhile, director Jay Sandrich, one of the most celebrated sitcom helmers in history—his credits stretch from Make Room For Daddy in 1963 to Two and a Half Men 40 years later—does a remarkable job orchestrating this intricate brew of action and patter and tomfoolery, so it’s a wonder this was the only theatrical feature he ever made. Also bewildering is the fact that Chase and Hawn never reteamed, because Seems Like Old Times did about the same brisk business that Foul Play did.
Seems
Like Old Times: GROOVY
Sunday, October 8, 2017
1980 Week: Night of the Juggler
The harshness of life in ’70s New York City inspired
countless film and TV projects—after all, what better setting for pulp-fiction
stories than a gritty metropolis filled with corrupt cops, frustrated citizens,
petty criminals, and violent street gangs? Consider Night of the Juggler, an otherwise forgettable thriller starring James
Brolin and Cliff Gorman. Out of context, it’s a silly action/suspense flick
about a lunatic who accidentally kidnaps an ex-cop’s daughter in a failed
extortion scheme. In context, the picture speaks to the same paranoia that gave
rise to Death Wish (1974), The Warriors (1979), and so many other
projects. Brolin stars as Sean Boyd, a divorced Californian now working as a
truck driver to help support his daughter, Kathy (Abby Bluestone), who lives
with her mother. One day, unhinged Gus Soltic (Gorman) snatches Kathy from a
park, mistaking her for the daughter of a corporate tycoon. Sean witnesses the
crime and nearly rescues his daughter, but Gus gets away and plunges Sean into
an ordeal. Sean also clashes
with authorities including Sgt. Otis Barnes (Dan Hedaya).
As directed by the
prolific and versatile Robert Butler, who spent most of his career in TV, Night of the Juggler moves along at a
terrific pace, with Brolin’s character almost constantly in motion, whether
he’s battling an opponent, hassling someone with information, or fleeing those
who seek to impede his search. The movie ventures into many of New York’s
dodgiest areas, from the sex palaces of pre-Giuliani Times Square to the
ravaged war zone of the Bronx, so Night of
the Juggler has atmosphere to spare. (As for the iffy title, Gorman’s
character delivers this dialogue: “I’m gonna juggle the books my way and it’s
gonna balance out for me!”). This is almost laughably shallow material, and
more than a few ugly stereotypes find their way into the mix, as when Sean
calls a Latino gang “a mean bunch of chili peppers.” Still, Night of the Juggler offers minor
pleasures. Brolin gives one of his stronger performances, Gorman infuses his
creepy character with a pathetic quality, and some of the supporting turns are
juicy—beyond the always-entertaining Hedaya, watch for Godfather guy Richard Castellano as a cop and Mandy Patinkin as a
Puerto Rican (!) cab driver.
Night
of the Juggler: FUNKY
Saturday, October 7, 2017
1980 Week: Home Movies
Brian De Palma took a break from his successful
career as a Hollywood director to teach filmmaking at Sarah Lawrence College,
where he’d done graduate work in theater, and this project resulted from
student exercises. Despite the involvement of marquee names including Kirk Douglas,
who has a small recurring role, the smart move would have been to let Home Movies linger in the relative
obscurity of academia, because it’s an embarrassment. Not only is Home Movies amateurish and silly, but
it’s suffused with crass elements including scenes during which the white
leading character wears blackface as a disguise. Credited to seven writers,
including De Palma, the narrative follows Denis Byrd (Keith Gordon), a young
man who takes a filmmaking course from “The Maestro” (Douglas). Egomaniacal and
overbearing, “The Maestro” encourages Denis to use his eccentric family as
fodder for a class project, so Denis tracks his philandering father (Vincent
Gardenia) and his older brother, James (Gerrit Graham), an
insufferable college professor who pummels his fiancée, Kristina (Nancy Allen),
with absurd rules about abstinence, diet, and exercise. Somehow this resolves
into Denis surreptitiously filming people having sex. The story
is coherent, but the events are pointless and random and tacky. James throwing food at Kristina because she broke a rule. Denis rescuing a lingerie-clad Kristina from a rapist. “The Maestro” climbing a tree to shame Denis for doing exactly what “The Maestro” asked, filming real life. Wasted are
Allen’s girl-next-door charm, Gardenia’s impeccable comic timing, and Graham’s
intense weirdness. Plus, seeing as how De Palma extrapolated many story
elements from his own life experiences, the odor of self-indulgence permeates.
Home
Movies: LAME
Friday, October 6, 2017
1980 Week: Fatso
Throughout the ’80s, Mel Brooks enjoyed a
thriving side career as the head of Brooksfilms, which produced The Elephant Man (1980), My Favorite Year (1982), and The Fly (1986). Not every Brooksfilms
release clicked, but it was a good run. Among the lesser Brooksfilms offerings was
this well-meaning dramedy, the sole feature film written and directed by
Brooks’ second wife, actress Anne Bancroft. (The two were married from 1964 to
her death in 2005.) Starring occasional Brooks collaborator Dom DeLuise, the
picture concerns exactly what the title suggests: a man struggling with his
weight. The comedy aspect stems from scenes of indulgence, with the title
character and his overweight friends gorging themselves in ridiculous ways, and
the dramatic aspect stems from the title character’s efforts to surmount the
self-loathing that stifles his ability to make better choices. In its best
moments, the picture shares some qualities with the classic character study Marty (1955), another tale of a pudgy
New Yorker struggling to believe that he deserves romantic affection. What’s
more, Fatso is utterly sincere,
regarding its troubled protagonist with empathy instead of judgment, and
DeLuise plays the role for pathos rather than cheap laughs.
The bad news is
that Bancroft lacks nuance and skill, no surprise given that she’d only
directed one short film prior to this project. For instance, it’s overly convenient that Dominick (DeLuise) happens upon the lovely Lydia
(Candice Azzara), who overlooks his girth—and the health risks accompanying
obesity—because her late father was also heavy. Bancroft’s storytelling comes
dangerously close to “I’m okay, you’re okay” platitudes, as if accepting
oneself is a reasonable compromise for sustaining unhealthy behavior patterns.
It doesn’t help that Fatso largely comprises
scenes of people screaming at each other. Bancroft appears as Dominick’s
overbearing sister, and her scenes with DeLuise are highly abrasive. So, too,
are vignettes with Dominick’s support group, the “Chubby Checkers,” whom
Bancroft portrays as repressed maniacs forever on the verge of gluttonous meltdowns.
(Though the movie doesn’t judge Dominick, it seems to blithely malign fat
people in general.) As a narrative, the picture sorta-kinda works, and DeLuise
plays sad scenes effectively. But as a piece of filmmaking, this is highly
amateurish stuff.
Fatso:
FUNKY
Thursday, October 5, 2017
1980 Week: In God We Tru$t
Improving somewhat over
his weak directorial debut, The Last
Remake of Beau Gueste (1977), actor Marty Feldman does an okay job as a
storyteller with this satire of for-profit religion, which he cowrote with
Chris Allen. Naturally, Feldman also plays the leading role, employing the same
comic dexterity that made him a star in his native England before American
audiences embraced his performance as Igor in Mel Brooks’ Young Frankenstein (1974). Featuring supporting turns by Peter
Boyle, Andy Kaufman, and Louise Lasser—plus an extended cameo by Richard Pryor—In God We Tru$t never wants for skillful
comedians. It also presents appealing themes of piety over profit and intimacy
over repression. But In God We Tru$t disappoints
more often than it connects. The characterizations are contrived, the satire is
shallow, and most of the jokes misfire, especially the borderline distasteful
sex gags. Slick work by the aforementioned big names compensates mightily,
as do polished production values, so In
God We Tru$t is basically watchable. Yet that’s about as far as one can go
in terms of praise.
The picture starts at a financially troubled monastery,
where Brother Ambrose (Feldman) gets assigned to raise money. He sets his
sights on televangelist Armageddon T. Thunderbird (Kaufman), but the
super-wealthy preacher refuses to see the penniless monk. Ambrose then meets a
prostitute named Mary (wink-wink) and an insane con-man preacher named Dr.
Sebastian Melmoth, who drives a school bus converted into a traveling church,
complete with a shingled roof and a steeple. Those roles are played by Lasser
and Feldman’s Young Frankenstein
costar Boyle, respectively. Most of this movie’s screen time gets chewed up by
scenes of Mary giving Ambrose a sexual education and by scenes of Thunderbird,
who sports an absurdly gigantic pompadour, fleecing his flock whenever he’s not
consulting with a computer program called G.O.D. (voiced and eventually played
onscreen by Pryor).
Typical jokes include a punny monastery sign (“Keep Thy Trappist
Shut”) and the bluntly satirical name of a house of worship (“The Worldwide Church of Psychic
Self-Humiliation”). Sex gags feature Feldman taking cold showers until Mary
sleeps with him, at which point the “Hallelujah” chorus fills the soundtrack.
The picture also has slapstick chase scenes and a vignette of Feldman screaming
a lustful confession to a deaf priest while the whole congregation listens
intently. Alas, no matter how sincerely Feldman wanted to skewer Christians foibles, Monty
Python’s outrageous Life of Brian
(1979) was a hard act to follow. That said, it’s a shame this mediocre effort was
Feldman’s final major project. He died in 1982, leaving behind only supporting
roles in the ghastly Jerry Lewis flop Slapstick
of Another Kind (1982) and the mediocre UK comedy Yellowbeard (1983).
In God We Tru$t: FUNKY
Wednesday, October 4, 2017
1980 Week: The Awakening
Lavishly produced
Egyptian-themed shocker The Awakening
starts out well enough, with atmospheric scenes of a studly scientist named Matthew
(Charlton Heston) tempting fate by exploring the tomb of an ancient Egyptian
queen. Rocks slide, traps are sprung, and victims accumulate as the movie sets
up the premise that centuries-dead “Kara” makes a magical connection with the
child Matthew’s wife delivers while he’s tampering with Kara’s resting
place. Throughout this very long prologue, The
Awakening effectively blends old-school mummy
mythology with modern evil-kid tropes along the lines of The Omen (1976). Then the picture cuts
ahead 18 years. Matthew’s daughter, Margaret (Stephanie Zimbalist), has become a young woman. Meanwhile, Matthew, long divorced from Margaret’s mother, has become obsessed with his greatest achievement, the discovery of the tomb. And then the story goes completely haywire, charting a downward spiral into nonsense as Kara’s spirit tries to possess Margaret’s body. Despite being adapted from a story by the
venerable Bram Stoker, of Dracula fame,
The Awakening is clunky and dull and episodic
and ridiculous, so the moodiness the filmmakers generated during the opening
scenes dissipates by the time the picture reaches its laughably over-the-top
climax. Making matters worse, Heston is quite terrible here, overdoing everything except his pathetic attempt at an English accent. So even though The Awakening is a highly
polished piece of work from a technical perspective, abysmal storytelling utterly neutralizes audience goodwill.
The Awakening: LAME
Tuesday, October 3, 2017
1980 Week: Midnight Madness
Much has been written
about Walt Disney Pictures’ efforts to stretch beyond family-friendly fare during the late ’70s and early ’80s, issuing such projects as The Black Hole (1979) and Dragonslayer
(1981). Yet perhaps more than grim fantasy films, the frenetic ensemble comedy Midnight Madness epitomizes this awkward transitional period. Borrowing tropes from the raunchy campus
comedy Animal House (1978), Disney’s Midnight
Madness includes a sight gag about a frat boy diving into a vat of
beer, a scene in which characters must decipher a puzzle clue about melons by staring at a woman’s gigantic breasts, and another scene in which characters illicitly aim a
telescope at a sexy girl’s window. Eventually, trying to
satisfy coarsening audience tastes while preserving the valuable Disney brand led the company to introduce a second distribution arm, Touchstone
Pictures. Midnight Madness represents a noteworthy step
along that path.
As for the movie itself, it’s a silly action/comedy hybrid in
the mode of It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad
World (1963), except for the collegiate set. A game designer challenges five teams to race through
Los Angeles from midnight to dawn, tracking cryptic clues to see which team can
arrive at the final destination first. Accidents, betrayals, cheating, greed,
hurt feelings, and misunderstandings ensue.As for the major characters, protagonist Adam (David Naughton) is a likeable freshman counselor afraid to make the first move with Laura (Debra Clinger) and oblivious to the insecurities of his younger brother, Scott (Michael J. Fox).
It’s all quite pointless, so the narrative is merely a flimsy excuse for fast-moving vignettes of
one-dimensional characters engaging in colorful antics. For instance, Harold (Stephen Furst) is a fat rich kid who constantly stuffs his face and uses a super-computer instead of his mind to solve clues. Similarly, Eddie Deezen plays yet another socially maladjusted weirdo. And while the picture has glimmers of wit, seeing as how game designer Leon (Alan Solomon) creates clever jumbles
that teams (and viewers) must decipher, Midnight
Madness is a bit of a slog, especially since it runs a full two hours. Still, the picture is executed well enough, and the actors give
enthusiastic performances. What’s more, the filmmakers throw in a few
complications to keep things from moving in a straight line.
Midnight Madness: FUNKY
Monday, October 2, 2017
1980 Week: Kagemusha
Thematically fascinating and visually
glorious, this Akira Kurosawa epic about political intrigue in feudal Japan has
several passages that are intoxicating. Moreover, the story delivers timeless themes by way of
characters that feel mythic, which has the effect of making the film seem like
a slick retelling of a fable that’s been handed down through generations. Yet Kagemusha is not
perfect. Parts of the movie are maddeningly sluggish, and the lead character’s
personality is presented so cryptically that it’s hard to buy into some of the
choices he makes. For viewers who accept that Kagemusha operates on a largely metaphorical level, however, the picture is
a feast for the mind and senses.
Exploring profound topics of honesty,
identity, and loyalty, the film tracks one man’s unlikely ascent from dishonor
to a peculiar kind of heroism. Set in the 16th century, the story begins by
introducing Lord Shingen Takeda (Tatsuya Nakadai), leader of the powerful
Takeda clan. Shingen’s pragmatic brother, Nobukado (Tsutomo Yamazaki), presents
a thief (also played by Nakadai) whom he recently saved from execution, noting
the thief’s resemblance to Shingen. Despite the thief’s obvious low character,
Shingen agrees to use the thief as a kagemusha,
or decoy, should the need arise. Soon afterward, Shingen suffers a mortal wound
while visiting a combat zone, and before he dies, he demands that his family
hide the news about his death for three years, giving the clan time to
consolidate power and groom a successor. The thief assumes the role of Lord
Shingen, but not without difficulty. Beyond the expected problems of failing to
convince the people who knew Lord Shingen best, there’s the issue of enemy
spies who saw part of the ritual during which Lord Shingen’s body was put to
rest. Eventually, the thief enjoys both failure and triumph while portraying
the deceased warlord, and the dramatic question becomes whether the clan can
survive without the strength and wisdom of the real Shingen.
While there’s
nothing new about the doppelgänger plot device, Kurosawa pursues goals much
loftier than the simple rendering of a premise. For instance, the film
approaches spirituality with its depiction of the thief internalizing the
reverence he sees directed toward Shingen even after the warlord’s death;
living up to the role becomes a form of personal transcendence. Similarly,
Kurosawa presents battlefield scenes as cinematic poetry—armies wearing
color-coded flags, lines of horsemen silhouetted against blood-red skies, combat
zones strewn with corpses. Throughout the movie, Kurosawa provides a master
class in composition, whether he’s using symmetrical rows of people or more
ephemeral elements, such as mist and smoke, to construct indelible images.
The
director also employs visions of pomp and ritual to ground his film in its
historical period. One striking vignette involves laborers using brooms to
erase hoof prints in a courtyard so a warlord’s dramatic entrance occurs on unmolested
soil. All of this is set to a regal orchestral score, which lends Shakespearan
grandeur. If there’s a significant complaint to be lodged against Kagenmusha, it’s that the film
represents the stately side of Kurosawa’s artistry rather than the kinetic
side. The dynamic filmmaker of the ’50s and ’60s emerges periodically during
action scenes, but Kurosawa relies quite heavily on static frames, which—along
with lengthy dramatic pauses—contribute to overly reverential pacing.
Kagemusha:
GROOVY
Sunday, October 1, 2017
City on Fire (1979)
A drab disaster flick
featuring phoned-in performances by faded Hollywood stars, the Canada/U.S.
coproduction City on Fire never quite
delivers on its title, offering instead a few explosions at a refinery and an
extended sequence during which flames threaten the occupants of a crowded
hospital. Vignettes depicting the impact of an allegedly citywide fire are
anemic at best. Furthermore, the underlying premise is quite sketchy. After
getting passed over for a promotion, disturbed refinery worker Herman (Jonathan
Welsh) rushes around the facility, releasing fuel into the adjoining city’s
water supply so that when sewer workers using a welding torch accidentally
ignite the fuel, flames emerge throughout the city. Because, of course,
disgruntled former employees are generally allowed free reign at high-security
facilities. Oh, well. The nominal hero of the piece is he-man physician Dr.
Frank Whitman (Barry Newman). Other characters include an alcoholic newscaster
(Ava Gardner), a stoic fire chief (Henry Fonda), an opportunistic mayor (Leslie
Nielsen), and a worldly nurse (Shelley Winters). As for the female lead, she’s heiress
Diane (Susan Clark), who shares romantic history with Frank and happens to be
at the hospital during the crisis. City
on Fire is so predictable and sluggish that it’s quite boring to watch,
though a few absurd moments amuse. In one scene, Diane scoops vomit from a
patient’s mouth while trying to deliver mouth-t0-mouth resuscitation. In
another, Frank walks down a row of burn victims, touching each one but never
performing medical services or issuing commands to subordinates. City on Fire eventually features a
decent fire walk by a brave stunt performer, but that’s hardly reason enough to
tolerate 106 minutes of stupidity and tedium.
City on Fire: LAME
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)