Showing posts with label james stewart. Show all posts
Showing posts with label james stewart. Show all posts
Friday, October 20, 2017
The Magic of Lassie (1978)
Thursday, May 7, 2015
The Big Sleep (1978)
Three years after playing Raymond Chandler’s
famous detective Phillip Marlowe in Farewell,
My Lovely (1975), which was set in the 1940s, Robert Mitchum reprised the
role in this film, which is set in the 1970s. Making the time-shift between
movies even more awkward, The Big Sleep writer-director
Michael Winner employs hokey devices straight out of Chandler’s Depression-era
fiction, such as femme-fatale types and hardboiled interior monologue presented
as voiceover. Yet in other respects, The
Big Sleep is quite modern, thanks to ample amounts of gore and nudity.
Therefore, it’s an old-fashioned movie filled with things that turn off most
fans of old-fashioned movies.
Moreover, Winner risked walking on hallowed
cinematic ground with this project, since the first movie version of The Big Sleep—starring Humphrey Bogart
and released in 1946—is considered a classic of the original film-noir cycle.
Given this tricky context, it almost doesn’t even matter that Winner’s version
of The Big Sleep is an adequate
little mystery/thriller. In order to satisfy all concerned parties, the movie
needed to be superlative, which it is not. Furthermore, Winner inexplicably changed the location from Los
Angeles (as in the original Chandler novel) to London, and then populated the
cast with a random mixture of Brits and Yanks. Since nothing inherently English
happens, the jump across the pond is a head-scratcher from a conceptual
standpoint.
In any event, the convoluted story begins when Marlowe is invited
to the home of a rich American, retired General Sternwood (James Stewart).
Sternwood hires Marlowe to scare off a would-be blackmailer. Meanwhile, Marlowe
receives seductive advances from Sternwood’s adult daughters, the cynical
Charlotte (Sarah Miles) and the provocative Camilla (Candy Clark). As per the
Chandler story, the seemingly simple job opens a Pandora’s box of secrets,
eventually placing Marlowe in the midst of betrayals, double-crosses, and
murders.
Winner hits the sleazy elements of the narrative hard, as in scenes of
Camilla posing nude for a pornographer and various incidents of people getting
shot through the skull. The material is so grim and the story is so bewildering
that The Big Sleep isn’t fun to
watch, per se, even though it boasts abundant sex appeal thanks to Clark,
Miles, and costars Joan Collins and Diana Quick. Concurrently, the men in the
supporting cast provide gradations of menace, with Colin Blakely, Richard Boone,
Edward Fox, and Oliver Reed playing villainous types. (Offering glimmers of
gallantry are the characters portrayed by Harry Andrews and John Mills.)
However, none of the film’s performances or technical contributions is
extraordinary, so Mitchum dominates in the absence of anything more
interesting. As in Farewell, My Lovely,
Mitchum’s seen-it-all demeanor suits the Marlowe character perfectly.
The
Big Sleep: FUNKY
Monday, July 22, 2013
Directed by John Ford (1971)
First off, this review is a bit of a cheat—I’ve
never had the pleasure of seeing the original 1971 cut of Directed by John Ford, which has been replaced in the marketplace
by a substantially re-edited 2006 version. That’s the cut I saw, and it’s
something of a hybrid. Although the bones of the piece are the same as in the
1971 version, writer-director (and Ford acquaintance) Peter Bogdanovich not
only excised some material and inserted replacement clips, but he also recorded
brand-new interviews with contemporary Ford admirers including Martin Scorsese
and Steven Spielberg. Furthermore, Bodganovich conducted new interviews with
still-living Ford collaborators and taped new onscreen remarks of his own. So,
while the 2006 version of Directed by
John Ford presumably represents the director’s fullest possible vision
circa the time of its release, it’s a stretch to say that I’m actually
reviewing the 1971 movie. Still, because the best parts of any version of Directed by John Ford are 1971 clips featuring
Ford and his famous leading men—Henry Fonda, Jimmy Stewart, John Wayne—most of
what makes the picture interesting has remained unchanged since the original
release.
Anyway, as the title suggests, Directed
by John Ford is a product of Bogdanovich’s lifelong crusade to celebrate
the contributions of cinema giants. Yet Bogdanovich’s interaction with Ford was
complicated. A master of mythmaking onscreen and off, the man considered by
many to be the greatest auteur of Western movies was born John Martin O’Feeney,
but, to quote a famous line from his 1962 film The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance, “When the legend becomes fact,
print the legend.” In other words, the man whom Bodganovich encountered was
deeply invested in protecting the reputation of macho filmmaker “John Ford.”
Though obviously in physical decline and well into professional twilight—he’d
already directed his last feature—Ford comes across as belligerent and
virtually monosyllabic, as if discussing his own artistry is unmanly. Watching Bogdanovich
tangle with Ford during their interview in Ford’s quintessential shooting
location, Monument Valley, is the core of the picture.
Elsewhere, during the
interviews with Ford’s key actors, Bogdanovich asserts himself as much as he
showcases his subjects. Taking the unusual approach of mounting his interview
camera on a dolly track, Bogdanovich can be seen in many shots motioning for
his cameraman to push in or pull back. Most of the star interviews feature
puffery, because even when the actors describe Ford’s difficult personality,
they’re burnishing his manly-man bona fides. And while the contemporary
interviews with Ford-loving filmmakers lend scholarly weight to Directed by John Ford, it’s hard to say
they’re essential. Beyond the footage Bogdanovich collected in the early ’70s,
the components that really are
essential are clips from Ford’s classics—The
Informer (1935), The Grapes of Wrath
(1940), The Quiet Man (1952), The Searchers (1956), and more. In a
profound way, Ford’s work speaks for itself, revealing a world of obsessions
that that Ford never articulated for any interviewer. Therefore, Directed by John Ford is illuminating,
though not necessarily in the manner that Bogdanovich intended.
Directed
by John Ford: GROOVY
Monday, April 1, 2013
Fools’ Parade (1971)
A weird adventure story
depicting the exploits of three ex-cons traveling through Depression-era West
Virginia, Fools’ Parade features such
a delicate combination of eccentric characterizations and literary contrivances
that it would have taken a director of tremendous artistry to pull the pieces
together into a coherent whole. Alas, Andrew V. McLaglen is not such a
director. Because he presents the story with the same brisk, unvarnished style
with which he made several entertaining action films, the peculiar nuances of Fools’ Parade end up feeling completely
false. So while the movie is watchable thanks to the novelty of familiar actors playing offbeat scenes, Fools’
Parade isn’t satisfying—the execution is too straight for fans of
idiosyncratic cinema, and the storyline is unlikely to thrill people who prefer
conventional narratives.
Jimmy Stewart stars as Mattie Appleyard, a recently
paroled inmate who accrued $25,000 in back pay through 40 years of hard labor
behind bars. Mattie has gathered a surrogate family of fellow ex-cons,
including Lee Cottrill (Strother Martin), a nervous would-be storekeeper, and
Johnny Jesus (Kurt Russell), a naïve youth. The trio’s goal of starting a
business together hits a roadblock when they realize their former jailor, a
psycho named “Doc” Council (George Kennedy), has conspired to prevent Mattie
from safely cashing his $25,000 check. This circumstance precipitates a battle
of wills between the ex-cons and their once and future oppressor, who chases
after them with gun-toting henchmen. There’s also
a subplot involving a blowsy madam (Anne Baxter) and a reluctant prostitute
(Kathy Cannon), plus another subplot involving a corrupt banker (David
Huddleston) who’s in cahoots with Council.
Fools’ Parade was based on a book by Davis Grubb, who also wrote the source
material for the 1955 cult classic The
Night of the Hunter. This is arch material, but McLaglen plays the story
straight, missing opportunities for irony, satire, and whimsy. Only
the action scenes really work, at least in the conventional sense. Another issue is the clunky dialogue by
screenwriter James Lee Barrett, much of which the normally excellent Huddleston
is forced to deliver; Huddleston is little more than an exposition machine here.
Despite these fatal flaws, Fools’ Parade is mildly arresting. Watching Stewart play a stately
crook who does things like yank his glass eye from his skull in order to tell
fortunes is bracing. Martin squirms through one of his signature performances
as a Southern-fried oddball. And Russell plays every moment with the same
gee-whiz sincerity he brought to myriad Disney flicks in the early ’70s. Yet
Kennedy delivers the movie’s most extravagant performance. Wearing grime over his teeth
and wire-rimmed glasses over his face, the bulky actor hunches over like a
troglodyte and drags out utterances in the vocal style a tweaked country
preacher. His acting is spectacularly bad. (Baxter almost matches him for
over-the-top stagecraft, especially since she wears garish whore makeup.) It’s
hard to imagine how or why Fools’ Parade
got made, since it must have been nearly as strange on paper as it is on
screen. After all, the climax features a sight gag involving a lovable dog fetching a stick of lit dynamite. However, these bizarre flourishes make Fools’ Parade a curio—one can only marvel that the movie exists.
Fools’ Parade: FREAKY
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
That’s Entertainment! (1974) & That’s Entertainment, Part II (1976)
Made to commemorate Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer’s
50th anniversary, That’s Entertainment!
is a documentary in name only, since the picture comprises clips from old
movies that are introduced—through new, scripted footage—by a group of movie
actors closely associated with the MGM studio. Anyone looking for behind-the-scenes gossip
or insight will be disappointed, but, as the film’s title suggests, providing information
isn’t the point. Rather, That’s
Entertainment! offers a massive array of show-stopping musical numbers,
including such classic moments as Fred Astaire’s graceful dance duet with Cyd
Charisse in The Band Wagon (1953), Judy Garland’s plaintive rendition of “Somewhere Over the Rainbow” from The Wizard of Oz (1939), Gene Kelly’s
exuberant performance of the title song in Singin’
in the Rain (1952), and dozens more. The picture also spotlights rarely
scene clips, including Clark Gable performing “Puttin’ on the Ritz” in Idiot’s Delight (1939), and features
montages celebrating the work of such Golden Age stars as Lena Horne, Ann
Miller, and Esther Williams.
The clips are nearly all dazzling, running the
gamut from outrageous Busby Berkeley-directed spectacles to simple vocal
performances, and the film’s seven editors did a remarkable job of organizing
the material into logical sections while also creating a smooth flow.
Writer-producer-director Jack Haley Jr.’s use of MGM stars as hosts works, too,
because their participation validates the piece; furthermore, seeing the
passage of time through their aging faces and physiques amplifies the nostalgia
of recalling a magical era from the past. (Accentuating this effect, many of
the hosts are shot walking through decrepit sections of the long-unused MGM
backlot.)
The impressive roster of hosts includes Fred Astaire, Bing Crosby,
Gene Kelly, Peter Lawford, Donald O’Connor, Debbie Reynolds, Mickey Rooney,
Frank Sinatra, James Stewart, Elizabeth Taylor, and the late Judy Garland’s
daughter, Liza Minnelli, who presents a sweet segment about “Mama.” Each host
offers a canned anecdote or two, and then narrates a few minutes of clips, so
Haley creates the illusion of old friends sharing memories at a reunion. That’s Entertainment! is total fluff,
but it lives up to its title and, in a cheerfully superficial sort of way,
provides a history lesson simply by cataloguing the best output from one
studio.
Alas, the film’s first sequel, That’s
Entertainment, Part II, is not nearly as charming. Kelly took over the
directing chores, and he co-hosts the entire film exclusively with fellow
song-and-dance legend Astaire. (Songwriter Sammy Cahn makes an ineffectual
appearance during one quick bit.) Kelly and his team cast a
wider net for different types of clips, since most of MGM’s best musical
numbers were used in the previous film. As a result, this picture features
random montages about great movie lines, plus such extended comedy bits as the
Marx Brothers’ classic “stateroom” scene from A Night at the Opera (1935). Combined with the lack of organization—the
movie jumps around between eras and genres—the inclusion of nonmusical scenes
makes That’s Entertainment, Part II
confusing and unfocused. Worse, Kelly stages all of the hosting bits
as musical numbers. While it’s fun to see Astaire and Kelly hoofing together,
their age and a general lack of inspiration makes these original production
numbers seem second-rate when juxtaposed with classic clips. Nonetheless, the
franchise soldiered on with a quasi-official follow-up called That’s Dancing In 1985 and then an
official, made-for-TV threequel called That’s
Entertainment III in 1994.
That’s Entertainment!: GROOVY
That’s Entertainment, Part II: FUNKY
Monday, July 2, 2012
The Shootist (1976)
The Duke finally rode off into the sunset with this
solemn but satisfying Western, which echoes the conclusion of star John Wayne’s
film career through a storyline about an aging gunfighter looking for the right
way to die. Although Wayne had been experimenting with possible final cinematic
statements throughout the early ’70s—for instance, he was memorably martyred in the terrific 1970 adventure The Cowboys—it’s generally agreed that Wayne knew his health would
prevent him from completing another film after The Shootist. Thus, the parallels between his offscreen and
onscreen exits make the picture feel weightier than it might otherwise, since
the film is actually rather gentle and talky.
After a montage of clips from old
Wayne movies is used to cleverly convert his various cowboy characterizations into
episodes from the colorful life of his current character, John Bernard Books,
the movie proper begins with Books’ arrival in Carson City at the tail end of
the Wild West period. Aware that he’s not well, Books seeks an examination from
a trusted physician—played, in a nice touch, by fellow cowboy-movie veteran
Jimmy Stewart—and learns he’s got terminal cancer.
Books rents a room from a graying
widow, Bond Rogers (Lauren Bacall), whose twentysomething son, Gillom (Ron
Howard), predictably regards Books with worshipful awe. As the leisurely plot
unfolds, old friends and enemies gravitate toward Books, some trying to exploit
him and some trying to settle old scores, so a major theme of the movie is that
Books’ violent life has left him with few real emotional connections. (Although
it explores them far less elegantly, The
Shootist anticipates themes that Clint Eastwood later investigated in his
own farewell to Westerns, 1992’s Unforgiven.)
The story twists and turns in order to set up the inevitable final
shootout, so the resolution of Books’ quandary about how to die won’t catch
anyone by surprise. Nonetheless, the way the picture assembles great Old
Hollywood faces, and juxtaposes them with newcomer Howard, basically works. And
because director Don Siegel was a master at screen economy—lest we forget, he
was Eastwood’s directorial mentor—The
Shootist never wanders into the realms of preaching or sentimentality, two
potential traps given the material. Instead, The Shootist is an exercise in Hollywood
mythmaking, and therefore exactly the right way for the actor born Marion
Robert Morrison to retire the larger-than-life screen persona he spent a
lifetime investing with idealistic meaning.
The
Shootist: GROOVY
Saturday, February 19, 2011
The Cheyenne Social Club (1970)
A charming Western comedy in the vein of Howard Hawks’ cowboy classics, this amiable picture pairs two of the genre’s greatest stars, Henry Fonda and James Stewart, in a lively story that both pokes fun at their wholesome images and suits their advanced ages at the time the movie was made. John O’Hanlan (Stewart) and Harley Sullivan (Fonda) are graying cowpokes working on a Texas ranch when John receives word that he’s inherited a business from his late brother. They travel to Wyoming, where they discover the business is actually a brothel, much to the chagrin of aw-shucks John. Aghast at the idea of running a house of ill repute, John decides to close the Cheyenne Social Club, which makes him a pariah among the business’ loyal patrons, but then he discovers he can’t cash out his inheritance. Furthermore, when the club’s sunny madam, Jenny (Shirley Jones), is attacked by a client, John’s sense of Texas justice kicks in and starts him down the road of developing a proprietary interest in the ladies’ welfare. Unfortunately for John, his noble actions make him a target for a huge clan of no-good varmints, meaning an extended stay in Cheyenne would be hazardous to his health.
Smoothly directed by studio-era Hollywood pro Gene Kellly, the dancer/filmmaker of Singin’ in the Rain fame, The Cheyenne Social Club is unabashedly old-fashioned, even with a handful of modern touches like location photography and brief nudity, so the dialogue gets a bit corny at times, there’s a great deal of sitcom-style patter between the stars, and the plotting is slick and uncomplicated. The Cheyenne Social Club also features the most whitewashed portrayal of prostitution this side of Pretty Woman (1990), which might make it unpalatable for some viewers. The cheerfully vanilla picture undoubtedly felt archaic in an era of revisionist Westerns, but seen with modern eyes, it’s as diverting as anything Hawks or Henry Hathaway helmed in the heyday of big-screen oaters. Fonda amusingly undercuts his heroic image by portraying a fellow more inclined to run from a fight than run into one, and Stewart uses his signature flummoxed stammer to great effect as a character unaccustomed to being a “man of property.” The Cheyenne Social Club isn’t a laugh-out-loud comedy so much as it’s a lighthearted yarn with comic touches, but that’s a good thing: The picture delivers a broad spectrum of entertainment, from action to jokes to romance, over the course of 103 amiable minutes.
Smoothly directed by studio-era Hollywood pro Gene Kellly, the dancer/filmmaker of Singin’ in the Rain fame, The Cheyenne Social Club is unabashedly old-fashioned, even with a handful of modern touches like location photography and brief nudity, so the dialogue gets a bit corny at times, there’s a great deal of sitcom-style patter between the stars, and the plotting is slick and uncomplicated. The Cheyenne Social Club also features the most whitewashed portrayal of prostitution this side of Pretty Woman (1990), which might make it unpalatable for some viewers. The cheerfully vanilla picture undoubtedly felt archaic in an era of revisionist Westerns, but seen with modern eyes, it’s as diverting as anything Hawks or Henry Hathaway helmed in the heyday of big-screen oaters. Fonda amusingly undercuts his heroic image by portraying a fellow more inclined to run from a fight than run into one, and Stewart uses his signature flummoxed stammer to great effect as a character unaccustomed to being a “man of property.” The Cheyenne Social Club isn’t a laugh-out-loud comedy so much as it’s a lighthearted yarn with comic touches, but that’s a good thing: The picture delivers a broad spectrum of entertainment, from action to jokes to romance, over the course of 103 amiable minutes.
The Cheyenne Social Club: GROOVY
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






